News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Grains Council backs change to AWB share structure 

Grains Council backs change to AWB share structure

07 Aug, 2008 12:41 PM
The Grains Council of Australia is recommending that growers vote in favour of the proposed AWB constitutional changes at the August 21 general meeting in Melbourne.

Grains Council of Australia chairman, Murray Jones, says the changes aim at removing the company’s dual share class structure were necessary in the new deregulated wheat export market.

“With the Federal Government’s changes to wheat export marketing arrangements coming into effect on July 1, Grains Council members agree that AWB needs to be commercially stronger to operate in this new marketing environment," he says.

“Grain growers in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia support AWB’s constitutional amendments that will put it on a level playing field with the bulk handling companies and international grain traders.”

Mr Jones says it's important to have a number of commercially strong companies in the market for grain growers to ultimately get the best deal for their wheat.

“It is time to move forward as an industry," he says.

"The current dual-share structure is not sustainable in the long term as it will undercut AWB's ability to compete in the marketplace.

"A minimum 75pc of both A and B-class shareholders must approve the resolution for it to be passed.

“I encourage all grain growers to attend the AWB General Meeting or cast their postal vote in favour of AWB’s constitutional changes.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Why does this body continue to say it represents the grains indusrty of Australia?

I, as a growe,r have not been asked by them for my view - they should just speak individually, otherwise who do they really represent? It certainly isn't me.

Posted by cannona, 7/08/2008 6:56:41 PM
The Grains Council ceased to be a creditable representative body when the two major wheat growing states, WA and NSW, withdrew.
Posted by Jock, 8/08/2008 8:24:01 AM
The Grains Council of Australia only speaks for VFF & Agforce. It does not represent the 2 major Grain growing states NSW and Vic.

Murray Jones has not consulted with the majority of growers and continues to unfairly represent the Industry.

By continuing to make these representations to Goverment he will stop any chance of GCA once again becoming the peak grains body and a new one will form away from GCA.

Mr Jones should fall on his sword and go home to run the farm and let the Industry reform its peak body. GCAs former CEO is now working for a major grain trader after seeing the GCA and the single desk destroyed.

Who needs a group that continues to betray the majority view?.

The media needs to take a reality check and start reporting what the majority wants not some small group working out of a flat in Canberra.

Posted by Barely surviving, 8/08/2008 8:53:10 AM
The Grains Council of Australia is one of many who represent the majority view.

The last vote at the AWB was 62pc in favour and by far most farm bodies agree that it is time to more on.

Posted by chook, 8/08/2008 9:05:53 AM
Some times we should not sit back and wait to be asked. By not allowing AWB the ability to change in an evolving market we are removing any chance of them being competitive or even existing in the future.
Posted by Clancy, 8/08/2008 9:17:50 AM
In a utopian world we would all get our way or at least be consulted by everyone we think should ask us. Every grower is entitled to speak up and be heard or even choose to be a member of a farmer representative organisation.

GCA is a democratic organisation so please contact them and have your say but be mature enough to realise that they are at least showing some leadership and realise that the AWB as we knew was gone as soon as “B” class shares where issued. However I would just like to ask cannona who will go into bat for them on national grains industry issues if the GCA and men like Murray Jones where not around?

Be very careful about agrarian delusions in our industry and look to see what other non-industry organisations like PETA can do. Please speak up and be heard but for peats sake be sure to kick the right heads because without a national organisation we may only kick our own arses in the long run!

Posted by forget the politics and take a look at the bigger picture for once!, 8/08/2008 9:47:36 AM
GCA is not a national organisation clearly when it has failed to re-build its relationships with NSW and WA. GCA failed to listen to its former member state bodies. Lets talk about democracy shall we.

On an individual grower basis, I have never been surveyed, nor seen any meetings advertised by the GCA on the major issues that have gone before the industry in the past 2 years.

Posted by cannona, 9/08/2008 10:38:59 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Murray Jones
Murray Jones
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Who is your preferred Leader of the Federal Opposition?

Brendan Nelson
(8%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(22.4%)

Peter Costello
(49.3%)

Julie Bishop
(9.8%)

Other
(10.5%)

Total Votes: 813
Poll Date: 03 August, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...