News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Race to save Grains Council of Australia 

Race to save Grains Council of Australia

18 Jun, 2009 04:33 PM
A LAST minute race is underway to find alternative funds to keep the Grains Council of Australia alive before the organisation formally folds next month because, after more than 70 years, it has run out of money.

The GCA board announced last week that it has unanimously agreed to commence winding up its activities unless a rescue package is delivered by July 1.

Contrary to earlier media reports, administrators have not been appointed, despite losses of about $356,000 in the past year and forecasts of a further deficit this year.

In a statement issued by GCA last week while chairman Murray Jones was overseas, it was revealed the winding up process would be carried out over four months.

Mr Jones said it was a "sad day for the industry".

"I am sure that you are aware of the difficulties many State and national agricultural representative organisations face due to the ongoing challenges in securing financial sustainability," Mr Jones said.

"Unfortunately, GCA has not been immune to these problems."

GCA has been in poor health for some years, but the Oil for Food scandal and the implications this had for the retention of the single desk was undoubtedly the straw that broke the camel's back.

In early 2007, soon after the release of the Cole Inquiry report into the scandal, WA Farmers Federation, followed by the NSW Farmers Association, resigned their membership over GCA's policy moves away from supporting the single desk and for apparently not listening to members who wanted a single desk kept.

The official NSW Farmers line last week, however, said it was because GCA had itself resigned from the National Farmers' Federation.

Some outspoken members of NSW Farmers' actually welcomed the collapse of GCA last week, but that is not a position supported by the NSW Farmers hierarchy.

GCA is said to have sounded out several organisations seeking their financial assistance and support through partnership opportunities.

GCA approached several relevant organisations, including GRDC, the Federal Agriculture Department, and Federal Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, seeking their financial support to form partnerships in conducting these roles.

In addition, Queensland lobby group, AgForce, has been on the phones trying to drum up support for GCA.

GCA performs important legislative roles on behalf of the grains industry, in particular in a formal consultation relationship with the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC), determining the annual compulsory levy, and removal of the GCA will leave a notable gap in the area of GRDC accountability.

There is also an obvious gap at the table of the National Farmers' Federation which, for some time, has had no specific grains industry representation.

NFF president, David Crombie, said it was disappointing to see a peak body collapse, particularly in the grains industry, which he said was very fractured.

"The grains industry is such an important industry for Australia and it's important that we have grain growers around our table at NFF," Mr Crombie said.

"While they haven't been a member at NFF for some time, it's disappointing to have them collapse.

"We'd be looking for another nationally significant body to rise out of this and take up membership with the National Farmers Federation."

Mr Crombie said NFF has changed its constitution – due to come into effect on July 1 – which broadens the membership scope and "makes NFF easier to do business with".

"So if we're unable to get a nationally representative grains body around our table we'd certainly encourage grain growers to get together and join us in the associate membership category," Mr Crombie said.

He said it was really up to the grains industry to sort themselves out and get a new national body together, adding there was no real role for NFF on that front.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
GCA should be allowed to fail. It did not stand and represent the majority of growers who wanted the retention of our national marketing pool. They have made their bed - GCA must now lie in it. Growers are all the poorer for the lack of fight from grower representative bodies during the struggle to keep the national pool.
Posted by cannona, 18/06/2009 8:59:21 AM
This is what happens when a representative body is not grassroot democratic!!! Good bye and good riddance.
Posted by Ken, 18/06/2009 9:27:32 PM
Shut the door and throw away the keys. GCA turned into a farce and a tragedy with shocking implications for Australian wheat growers who are left with no equity in the market place through the loss of the single desk.
Posted by Wheat Fields., 18/06/2009 10:39:21 PM
Such short memories! It is not many years ago that the GCA was the number one barracker for the AWB Ltd group, no matter how much equity AWB was ripping out of the National Pool. Remember the Pool Remuneration Model that the GCA of the day said was fine, even though West Australian growers were left funding most of the cost of carrying AWB in low production years? AWB Ltd and the former Australian Wheat Board relied on GCA for political support and used to pay for it. When they no longer had a use for GCA it was 'goodbye'. At least Murray Jones had the courage to stand up when he saw it was inevitable that the monopoly was gone and tried to lead in a sensible manner.
Posted by damian capp, 19/06/2009 11:27:28 AM
Onya Damian. True support for WA wheatgrowers backed up by the facts!
Posted by WA Wheatgrower, 20/06/2009 1:05:39 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
16 June, 2009
15 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the deregulation of the wheat industry's single desk marketing system been beneficial to grain growers?

Yes
(25.4%)

No
(50.4%)

It's too soon to tell
(24.2%)

Total Votes: 476
Poll Date: 14 June, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...