News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Single desk not on Windsor's wish list 

Single desk not on Windsor's wish list

03 Sep, 2010 09:28 AM
HE might wield enormous clout over who forms the next Government, but independent MP Tony Windsor has confirmed that reinstating the single desk for wheat marketing is not on his negotiation agenda.

The NSW Farmers' Association in particular is keen to push the issue with Mr Windsor and his fellow independent colleagues, given the position the three now find themselves in helping Labor or the Coalition to form minority Government.

Mr Windsor supported grain growers opposed to the abolition of the single desk by the Rudd Government, and in early 2008 commissioned his own poll of Australian wheat growers to prove the vast majority rejected the changes the Government had committed to.

Mr Windsor insists all marketing arrangements could be on the table once a government is formed, but it's not an issue he'll be pushing in discussions with both sides of politics in the discussions to form a government.

"I haven't actually thought that far in front," Mr Windsor told Rural Press this week.

"I'm not sure what shape of Government we'll be dealing with.

"If my vote becomes relevant there are a whole range of positive things that could be done."

Mr Windsor believes those staunch supporters of the single desk and its reinstatement were "captured" by The Nationals, who voted against its dismantling, in a political competition.

He said they were used as "pawns" in a game where he believed the Coalition had actually agreed to split on the issue.

Mr Windsor acknowledged there were many wheat growers "panicking" about the coming wheat harvest, and even those who believed in free marketing were now seeing the benefits of the old system.

NSW Farmers' Association grains committee chairman, Mark Hoskinson, said a proposal had been put to the independents and both sides of politics in the hope that whichever forms the next government could "correct the dysfunction" that was now plaguing wheat marketing.

Mr Hoskinson acknowledged it would be too hard to completely go back to the old system which was dismantled in 2008, but said there could be many significant changes made which would give growers more certainty and security in the growing and marketing of their wheat.

He said what was needed was to essentially go back to old pool arrangements but allow multiple sellers into the market.

He said a national marketer would allow people to market their own wheat if they chose to but would offer a national pool which would also ensure appropriate promotion of grain, logistics arrangements, port access and stock management.

"We need some political will to recognise wheat growing and marketing starts inside the farm gate, not outside," Mr Hoskinson said.

"Growers have been totally removed from the system.

"We weren't captured in the process. The Nationals and the independents were the only ones supporting the growers.

"The only thing we ask of the independents is that with the position they now find themselves in, particularly given their public support for the survival or rural and regional Australia, that maybe they could help support this."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Congratulations to Tony Windsor for recognising the anxiety in the wheat gowing community following the treacherous removal of the single desk by Liberal and Labor. His comments in regards to the free marketers now seeing the benefits of old system are particularly pertinent. The Windsor Poll which was conducted prior to deregulation showed beyond all doubt that the single desk was supported by the great majority of growers across all states.
Posted by Realist, 3/09/2010 7:49:04 PM
Correct, the wheat industry good functions are dysfunctional, chopped up and spread around various organisations to the point where nothing is done. Thanks to a lazy Minister and a predetermined outcome given to the IEG. We are now in the situation where we rely on traders to provide market feedback and these same people deny any quality issues or concerns from the customers at present. Well we now have APH growers $100 worse off because customers don't get the quality they expect, there are no enforcible rules for export and so traders are able to blend away off grades. The whole industry good functions has collapsed because people are afraid to levy a few cents per tonne and yet what was paid for the WEA was wasted. If the 3 amigos can fix this then they have just made farmers and Australia a fortune.
Posted by concerned, 4/09/2010 5:07:31 PM
The issue is not about single or multiple desks re marketing Australian wheat, bur rather about the trade-offs that are always part of the marketing process. If we are to believe Nicholas Stern, spokesman for the LSE, EU & UN," trade barriers" will be in place against countries not fully committed to carbon tax or seen not be complying with the laws thereof as the LSE, EU & UN want to make them. Those factors will make the trade-offs far more complex and dangerous in terms of bio-security breaches than they are now. North Atlantic Crop & livestock diseases are subject to growth retarding winter conditions that simply don't exist in Australia. It amounts to nothing less than a blueprint for disaster to ignore those facts during any debate about global market trading & trade-offs. Focus on the trade-offs & demand that a trade-offs list be published & updated daily on the net. The Sterns of this world must be made to acknowledge that the bio-uniqueness of this Island Continent are far more important than the economic ideals of the LSE, EU & UN's economic rationalists.
Posted by jock, 4/09/2010 9:11:08 PM
Single desk is the best for Australian growers but it is gone. Get on with life.
Posted by mark, 6/09/2010 10:51:14 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 September, 2010
POLL
Q: Are the current record lamb prices sustainable for the industry in the long term?

Yes
(37.2%)

No
(49.9%)

Unsure
(13%)

Total Votes: 401
Poll Date: 29 August, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...