News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 War of words over GM exports 

War of words over GM exports

07 May, 2010 10:51 AM
THE Australian Oilseeds Federation (AOF) has hit back at claims that the refusal of some European canola buyers to purchase genetically modified (GM) canola proves Australia should not grow GM varieties.

Gene Ethics director Bob Phelps said the stance of some European buyers, together with a commitment of Japanese importers to non-GM canola out of South Australia, the last major canola-producing state not to lift its moratorium on commercial production of GM canola, highlighted the market preference for non-GM.

"The Japanese are writing GM-free contracts with South Australian growers, where the government has extended their GM canola ban till 2014, while in Victoria last season, farmers who produced GM-free canola were paid up to $15 per tonne more than farmers who grew GM,” he said.

However, AOF vice president Robert Green said this market choice was what the AOF wanted when advocating the introduction of GM, saying the ability of the Australian canola industry to meet the requirement both for GM and non-GM was exactly what was both expected and intended when approval to grow GM was granted.

“The various Green groups seemed to have missed the point about the intention and capability of the industry to segregate non-GM canola to ensure that where there is demand for non-GM canola, it can be met,” he said.

Mr Phelps said the refusal of buyers wanting non-GM to source even non-GM canola out of grain terminals that handled GM product meant non-GM producers were getting a raw deal.

“Neither Elders Toepfer Grain, nor CBH, would buy canola from any receival depot that handled GM on the east coast last harvest.”

He called on the WA parliament to continue to prohibit the planting of GM canola, saying it was not what the market wanted and was unfair to non-GM producers.

However, Mr Green said co-existence of GM and non-GM had worked well.

“The practical experience and success in segregating non-GM canola in the eastern states has given the West Australian grains industry a walk up start in being able to ensure effective segregation throughout the supply chain of non-GM canola.

“This means that if any customers, be they domestic or international who require non-GM canola will be able to be supplied non-GM canola in line with their requirements,” Mr Green said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Green is not only totally wrong, he is delusional if he thinks GM will not contaminate non GM. He talks about choice, GM takes away farmers choice, buyers choice and consumers choice. Experience everywhere clearly demonstrates GM will always contaminate via pollen drift, seed contamination or deliberate mischief by those with an ulterior motive.
Posted by ggwagga, 10/05/2010 7:45:02 AM
Perhaps we should feed GM canola to the whales.
Posted by Nigel Fuss, 10/05/2010 8:11:29 AM
Bob Phelps only believes in individual choice when he's making it. It's high time Rural Press stopped giving him exposure.
Posted by dickytiger, 10/05/2010 10:10:45 AM
Not long ago all canola here was GM-free. Now small packaged food companies must pay a lot of money to carry a GM-free label. That extra cost is passed onto us, or foregone. No one requests GM, nor is it any cheaper to buy. What benefit does GM provide? GM canola jeopardises conventional and organic crops, we've lost markets, cancels out many food products for people who want to buy GM-free under our weak labelling laws and it's quite possibly toxic to us, animals, the soil and the greater environment. I wish it would go away and I'm bored of the pro-GM promotions of safety and choice rhetoric.... come on we're not all morons
Posted by GMfreecanolaNow, 10/05/2010 6:42:59 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: What impact will the proposed changes to tax system have on your farm business?

Help
(6.2%)

Hurt
(67.3%)

No change
(26.5%)

Total Votes: 324
Poll Date: 02 May, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...