News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Cattle price crisis prompts Bindaree forum 

Cattle price crisis prompts Bindaree forum

21 Jan, 2010 09:53 AM
FORGET good seasons, new markets, growing demand or food security issues – it won't mean a thing unless the decline in real returns to cattle producers is quickly turned around.

That message will underpin a new campaign by Inverell processor and long-time industry agitator, John "JR" McDonald, of Bindaree Beef, who is making it his mission in 2010 to educate farmers about what they're actually getting paid – more than 20 per cent less than 20 years ago in real terms – and why this is unsustainable.

Mr McDonald and his family will kick off that campaign with a big beef industry forum in Armidale next month, calling for transparency in the fees and charges being collected by government and industry bodies and benchmarks to help address this decline and get Australian producers on a more equal footing with international competitors.

The campaign is being watched with caution at Meat and Livestock Australia, whose boss, David Palmer, agrees cattle prices are "frightful" but says this is largely a result of currency woes, variable seasons and economic slumps in major markets like Japan – all of which are largely out of the producers' control.

He says productivity has and will remain the key to staying on top of what have been near unchanged prices in real terms since the 1950s.

But Mr McDonald believes the figures on the decline in returns should trigger a major refocus.

Most alarming he says is the fact weighted average saleyard prices for cattle in 2008/2009 were 21.6 per cent lower than 1988/89 figures and 27.2 per cent lower than 1983/84 returns, according to data compiled by the Australian Bureau of Resource Economics (ABARE) late last year.

In today's terms, the 2008-09 weighted average saleyard price for cattle was 300.53 cents a kilogram – in 1988/89 the price was 383.47c/kg.

The fall in domestic consumption of beef over the years is just as frightening, he said.

In 1989 each Australian ate 43.2kg of beef each year, and in 1998, when the Meat Standards Australia grading system was launched to reverse falling per capita beef consumption, each Australian ate 38kg of beef.

The MLA forecast for 2009 is that each Australian would eat 31.3kg of beef.

This is despite almost $10 a head in industry and government fees and charges collected at the point of slaughter, much of which go towards research, development and marketing, he said.

American farmers pay the equivalent of $1 a head.

"Our industry is close to crisis point," Mr McDonald said.

"The costs faced by our farmers and industry compared to our overseas competitors is unsustainable.

"Cattle prices are in dramatic decline and our farmers will go out of business.

"We are going to have to change all this, we need a new plan, even some new leadership, to turn this very serious situation around."

Mr McDonald said there were so many costs involved in with producing cattle today, many of which he says are unsustainable and need to be overhauled, and the level of duplication among the large number of peak industry bodies was also costing too much money.

The forum in Armidale on February 27 will call for complete disclosure of where all the money collected at slaughter is actually going, for what purposes, and whether the expenditure is working.

He said the industry must work on boosting its domestic markets so it was not so exposed to fluctuations in the Australian dollar.

Meat and Livestock Australia managing director, David Palmer, said McDonald was correct that "prices are frightful".

"You don't have to go to the meeting at Armidale to know that prices are crook," Mr Palmer said.

"They are terrible, and it's been well and widely documented as to why they are.

"Currency, the variable seasons, the global crisis – we've got Japan who is an enormous customer for Australian beef is in the most terrible doldrums.

"We're in a cash-strapped environment and it's having a huge impact on beef and other commodities."

Mr Palmer, who will attend the meeting, said the real price of cattle had not altered much since 1950.

"There was a gyration in the 70s and 80s, but these prices in real terms have narrowly traded in a fifty cent band since 1950," Mr Palmer said.

"The correcting element, which has given sustainability to the industry, has been productivity improvement.

"Australian agriculture since 1953 has trebled in productivity and the Australian beef industry has to achieve 2 per cent per annum in productivity improvement just to stay still."

* For information on the forum go to www.bindareebeef.com.au or phone (02) 6721 1411.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Bindaree and JR McDonald are little more than mischievous with the claim that MSA is to blame for Australia's woes. Bindaree supports a grading system that describes some cuts as "low quality". That is a good way to start turning more people off all beef by associating it with LOW quality. Australia has a wealthy, multi-cultural population, many of whom are not accustomed to eating large amounts of beef. We have left-wing lobby groups galore, often funded by public money, telling all and sundry why they should not eat beef - reasons ranging from bogus health risks to carbon neutral crap. The fact that Australians still eat as much as we do is a feather in the cap of MSA. If JR got off his butt and actively marketed beef across the world instead of just pushing it into USA he might be doing something positive about the problem.
Posted by Bruce, 22/01/2010 6:57:54 AM
It appears that we as producers are getting ZERO value from the $5 per head levy. Where have all the promises gone? Who's selling beef to the public? It's all the fault of $AUS that's why lamb and sheep prices are booming!! Get on with the job of selling beef!
Posted by GT, 22/01/2010 7:07:35 AM
If the beef industry is doing it so tough, what has supported the property market boom over say the past 8 years? It would appear that property prices are not supported by productivity returns.
Posted by Andrew Taylor, 22/01/2010 7:52:46 AM
Good luck with your forum, you will need it. Falling terms of trade for all primary producers will see the demise of the family farm business. Food is too cheap and we as producers refuse to band together to change anything imagine a workers union putting up with our lot!! Prepare for corporate farming.
Posted by Screwed, 22/01/2010 7:59:59 AM
This is the guy that supports the legislation requiring "Low Quality" labels at retail on beef from older animals. Imagine what that will do to demand! Time to look forward, not backwards.
Posted by practical farmer, 22/01/2010 8:17:12 AM
There have been a lot of producers saying this for a lot of years and it is about time that there was a focus on prices paid to the farmers. I agree with John McDonald. I think that it has come about by the corporate cattle man who producers numbers which have to go to market so they accept the going rate as they have share holders to keep happy. If they break even or make a loss then the newspaper company gains and what ever other companies they own gain an advantage. When the family farm makes a loss then the whole family go with out. I would like to see that part of the campain is that we have a week of no cattle sales to markets saleyards and processors. This should be planned when the demand is high in the usual peak part of the season when they all are after the product. I would also like to see producers at saleyards start to say it has not reached the reserve and you can knock it down to the highest bidder for negotiation after the sale. I believe that the producer needs to take control of the price he gets for his stock. This favourite statement by auctioneers of "it is here to be sold, make an offer" should start to have implications and penalties for the agents. Think!!
Posted by steve, 22/01/2010 8:45:07 AM
Willing buyer, willing seller. If world population and wealth keeps rising then long term demand for high quality food like beef will improve. Supply won't increase as fast - so over time prices should be going up. That is the market at work. Government fees are a good point. But the rest of this 'campaign'? The prices we get now are mostly just the market at work. Unless Binderee can get a better price from Maccas or Sanger for their product OR can reduce their margins then prices for graziers selling to them won't improve.
Posted by Skeptic, 22/01/2010 1:03:37 PM
What has the MLA to respond to the destructive regression in returns to the producer? What have they achieved and why are they still taking funds by compulsory aquisition for such a negative result? One buyer at auction for one customer, not one buyer for several customers. Auctioneer scrutiny to ensure that they are acting for the producer from whom they take the fee from. It's time the TPA was applied to the cattle business. The dollar fluctuation has very little influence compared to if the above competitive items are not correctly managed.
Posted by pepper, 22/01/2010 5:48:54 PM
It’s so good to see Palmer admit that there has been no improvement in cattle prices since the 1950s. So we need 2% gain in productivity just to stay still; what happens when there is no productivity gains to be had; I believe we have reached this point or very close to it. The increase in regulation by Palmer’s MLA and RMAC in the last decade have overtaken all the annual productivity gain on their own, that is why AA Co and other corporates are running at huge losses; McDonald is right if nothing is done the cattle industry is finished. These revelations mean that all the billions in funding for the current "industry" that has been going on since 1935 have simply been a gross waste of taxpayers' funds; MLA should be wound up; the cartel of RMAC should be disbanded; the Meat and Livestock Industry Act repealed, and let us own our cattle again.
Posted by The Serf, 23/01/2010 12:41:43 PM
Andrew Taylor: You're quite right and there is a rural property market crash that will make the USA look like a Sunday school picnic; I know of properties that were bought for $20 million in the last 8 years and in fact on their earnings they are barely worth $4 million, and if the cattle market falls a bit more $2-$3 million and the banks are getting impatient. I hope the banks read what Palmer said!!!
Posted by The Serf, 23/01/2010 12:52:09 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: If a referendum were held this weekend, would you vote in favour of the Commonwealth taking over from the States the management of Australia's river systems?

Yes
(72.6%)

No
(19.9%)

Undecided
(7.4%)

Total Votes: 647
Poll Date: 17 January, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...