News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Coles pork to be sow stall free 

Coles pork to be sow stall free

21 Jul, 2010 04:43 PM
In a major blow for conventional pork production, Coles is phasing out the sale of pork at its in-house butcheries that is sourced from piggeries using sow stalls, and aims to be fully "sow-stall free" by 2014.

But Australian Pork Ltd says the move is "unhelpful" to the process of change being undertaken by the industry as a whole to address the public's animal welfare concerns.

It is also demanding that Coles apply the same welfare standards to processed pork imported from overseas producers.

Coles general manager of meat, Allister Watson, said "sow-stall free" producers will start supplying sow stall free pork to the Coles Butcher range from 2011.

Coles currently offers sow stall free pork in the Otway, Linley Valley, and KR branded Outdoor Reared ranges.

"Our customers are becoming increasingly interested in welfare issues surrounding pig farming, with the use of sow stalls their greatest concern," Mr Watson said.

"For a number of months now, Coles has been working on plans with our pork producers to phase out sow stalls.

"We are working with our growers to ensure they avoid onerous costs in changing how they raise pigs.

"Changes will therefore take time to complete, but Coles and its suppliers are stepping heavily in the right direction."

But APL chief executive Andrew Spencer said Coles must confirm that it intends to place the same sow-stall free restrictions on imported pork used to make ham and bacon products.

"Currently more than 70 per cent of ham and bacon products are made from imported pork produced in countries such as Denmark, Canada and the US," Mr Spencer said.

"These countries continue to use and have no plan to stop using gestation stalls.

"If Coles believes this move is about animal welfare, then consumers should demand the same standards apply for their ham and bacon products.

"If Coles does not move to do so, the retailer would leave itself open to claims of double standards by Australian consumers and farmers.

"Australian pork farmers adhere to some of the highest welfare standards around the world, as required by the national Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals: Pigs and regulated in states.

"If consumers do want to source pork made from Australian grown pork, especially ham and bacon, they should look for the hot pink Australian Pork PorkMark label. This is a mark that guarantees the pork in the pack or the deli cabinet is Australian grown."

Mr Watson said that Coles has developed its own pork welfare model, as opposed to those set by the industry and the RSPCA, claiming it "will be better for our customers, better for our growers, and most importantly, better for pigs".

Coles says its new pork welfare policy has also delivered Australia’s first private label free range pork products, developed in conjunction with the RSPCA.

Coles Finest free range pork lands in 60 Coles Supermarkets in ACT, NSW and Victoria this week.

The Coles free range pork comes from pigs which are born and raised on RSCPA Approved farms.

RSPCA Australia CEO Heather Neil commended Coles for showing leadership on pig welfare and said the move was the strongest signal yet that sow stalls were no longer palatable to consumers.

"The RSPCA has always said that to have a meaningful impact on pig welfare we need humane pork products on every supermarket shelf across Australia," Ms Neil said.

"To take pork produced from pigs in sow stalls off the shelves of a major retailer is a huge step towards achieving that."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So what all the imported ham and bacon they are selling comes from Piggeries overseas where the sows spend most of their life in stalls. So is this a level playing field? or fair to Aussie Pig Farmers?
Posted by Porridge, 22/07/2010 8:49:42 AM
A clear win for PETA over the pork producers of Australia
Posted by Farmer Dave, 22/07/2010 9:42:13 AM
A friend remarked to me this morning that Coles must think Australian consumers want to eat 'ethical' pork that has been free ranging on its own excrement.
Posted by Woolman, 22/07/2010 12:08:50 PM
Is it more humane to have sows eat their piglets, or to roll over on them and crush them? The amount of misinformation driving decisions such as this is huge. Producers, Unite!
Posted by WA Aggie, 22/07/2010 1:47:11 PM
As usual, 'industry' has to be dragged kicking and screaming to improve the welfare of their animals. Try living in a sow stall marginally bigger than your whole body for most of your life and see how you like it. Cretins! Try it with a dog or a cat and you will be prosecuted. Go Coles! The first step is a momentous one.
Posted by Nicky, 22/07/2010 4:43:27 PM
Congratulations to Coles for taking the initiative. It is a bit late for Australian Pork Limited (APL) to be complaining. The message that it is unacceptable to cram pregnant pigs into steel cages has been loud and clear for a long time and APL have ignored retailers and consumers to their peril. Government has also failed to take the lead on pig welfare standards. Tasmania decided to go it alone because everyone was growing old waiting for APL and Government to address the issue. The management of APL has been appalling and the extensive producers who pay a levy to APL for every pig killed should consider a challenge. The Australian Government matches research and development money with APL but the question goes begging – how much is spent on extensive production research and how much is spent justifying intensive confinement? They do nothing to support the extensive producer and are only now playing catch up. So thank you Coles for taking an industry lead on this issue as it is important to many Australians.
Posted by HSI, 22/07/2010 7:06:35 PM
HSI- still doesn't answer the question of whether Coles will impose the same welfare standards on the imported product and whether Coles will inform their shoppers of such conditions. I see a fair amount of opportunism here. I wonder how much impact consumers will have over production standards when everything on the shelves is being imported?
Posted by mark2, 23/07/2010 9:36:47 AM
Nicky, (and others of your ilk) cretins would wish to see pregnant sows harassed, injured, mounted & ridden to the ground by dominant animals, aborting their piglets as a result. Cretins wouldn't be concerned about little piglets being squashed & suffocated by the sow, or gobbled up alive by her or other pigs. Cretins wouldn't give a fig about piggery staff being at risk from these big, aggressive animals. And cretins might be pleased to see fewer pigs, less pork to sell, and higher meat prices, denying those amongst us who are not so fortunate a valuable food source, as a result of this change. Comparing companion animals such as dogs & cats to food animals amounts to ludicrous emotional blackmail of the gullible, anyway, properly maintained dogs & cats should spend half their life, or more, chained or penned at night, or when left alone, by responsible owners, preventing them from roaming. Your selfishness is obscene. Incidentally, I wouldn't knowingly eat free range pork, as pigs will eat any kind of rubbish they find, carcasses, other animal's poop, anything they dig up. So will chooks.
Posted by a GRAZIER, 23/07/2010 11:32:34 AM
People need to wake up to the realities here. Sows in a free range situation attack other sows, eat piglets, roll on them and squash them to death. Is this the humane solution you want? Do the overseas sellers of pork have sow stalls? How is this going to be policed overseas? I urge the consumers to vote with their feet - I for one will not buy imported pork. What is in it for a start? And why support overseas farmers while ruining our own? Our farmers are employers - do you want to discourage employment? If a farmer can't make a profit he will close down and with him will go the jobs. Support Australia, not some idealistic impractical dream.
Posted by Concerned Northerner, 23/07/2010 11:55:22 AM
Mark that is a different battle. If the pork coming in is not sow stall free it cannot be labelled that way. It all comes back to truth in labelling, be it product of Aust of Welfare Friendly. Then the consumer can decide what suits their personal ethics. The important thing for Australian producers to do now is to move in to sow stall free production to ensure welfare friendly food from other countries does not replace local product. Many large forward thinking producers are alreadygoing down that path and there should be sufficient quantities of locally sourced sow stall free pork to satisfy consumer demand.
Posted by HSI, 23/07/2010 12:02:45 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
20 July, 2010
POLL
Q: For which party will you vote at the August 21 federal election?

Labor
(10.6%)

Liberal
(43.8%)

Nationals
(29.1%)

Greens
(8.4%)

Independent
(6.1%)

Other
(2.1%)

Total Votes: 1053
Poll Date: 17 July, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...