News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Live export regaining confidence 

Live export regaining confidence

24 Oct, 2011 03:00 AM
THE live export industry remains nervous about more animal cruelty vision potentially surfacing in the future and sparking another knee-jerk political response, as it struggles to regain lost confidence following the Federal Government’s snap suspension of the live cattle trade to Indonesia in June.

Northern Territory Cattlemen’s Association executive director, Luke Bowen, said about 100,000 head of feeder cattle had been exported to Indonesia since the month-long ban was lifted.

But he said fears remained within the industry that extreme animal rights groups were looking to sabotage live export.

"Confidence is an issue in Australia and Indonesia - industry members are concerned animal activists are continuing with their campaigns to end the trade and the rug could be pulled out from under them again, just as abruptly," he said.

Mr Bowen also said an economic bubble was developing due to underlying structural issues caused by the trade ban, which may not surface until next season or beyond.

Cattle prices, which have held up well in recent months, were masking deeper financial issues not clearly evident to untrained observers, he said, including loss of land values and disruption of business trading cycles.

He said the Government’s $25,000 business assistance packages and low interest loans had been unable to provide any real respite from the ban’s true financial impacts on industry, with many businesses suffering from eroded equity as a consequence.

In September an Indonesian animal rights group posted vision to Animals Australia, allegedly filmed in late August in three Indonesian abattoirs.

Cattle Council of Australia (CCA) executive director, David Inall, said the vision, which he viewed with the RSPCA, depicted some poor handling practices such as poor head restraint and knife work, but did not show any deliberate torment of animals.

It also failed to clearly identify if the animals being slaughtered even originated from Australia. Mr Inall said the footage was testament to the importance of Australia’s presence in the complex market in helping to improve animal handling practices throughout the supply chain.

In a letter to Federal Agriculture Minister, Joe Ludwig, dated September 12, Animals Australia investigator, Lyn White, said she hadn’t requested the footage taken by the Indonesian activists.

However, she used the footage to urge the Labor caucus to support a motion mandating stunning, which was passed last week in a watered down version amended to stunning as a "preference".

Last Tuesday, Senator Ludwig said Australian cattle exporters anticipated about 200,000 head of cattle would be exported to Indonesia in the last part of this year.

"The fact the number of cattle exported to Indonesia looks set to exceed 100,000 since the lifting of the temporary suspension is a testament to the hard work of industry and of Government," he said.

"This is an important, legitimate and valuable industry for Australia, and one the Government is committed to supporting."

Senator Ludwig said financial assistance was still available for individuals, pastoralists and supporting industries impacted by the temporary suspension, as trade continues to get back up and running.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The industry SHOULD be nervous. But if they cleaned the trade up they'd have nothing to fear. And Ludwig's answer to everything is to keep throwing money at it. Weak as water.
Posted by melinda, 24/10/2011 8:52:08 AM
What is "weak as water" are those who sit in cities, having never been closer to the bush than a theme park or botanical gardens and dictate to people on how to live their lives and how to run a business.
Posted by foodforthought, 24/10/2011 9:28:03 AM
He's actually saving you money Melinda - enough money might actually stop the compensation claim or do you think companies can cop $80,000 a day shipping charges for weeks on end caused by irresponsible gov kneejerk actions.

You either pay one way or you pay another. Lump it or like it but it is what you caused by your kneejerk irresponsible reaction to a very biased report.

Irresponsible because both parties did not fairly investigate anything before reacting. At least the gov has attempted to learn. Can't say the same about you.

Posted by Jen from the bush, 24/10/2011 12:11:28 PM
Foodforthought;

You have got it in one!!!

Posted by mike tancock, 24/10/2011 12:30:48 PM
We have absolutely no sympathy for these parasites and it is only a matter of time before this wretched trade is exposed again. Two expensive taxpayer funded reviews achieved precisely nothing for the animals, because if you want a review to say what you want it to say you appoint government lackeys to do it. Businesses have to change in response to government policy all the time, and do not get massive taxpayer handouts when they cry poor. Look at the meatworkers after you killed their jobs. You deserve it all, because you are knowingly exposing millions of animals to the most egregious abuse
Posted by Nicky, 24/10/2011 5:20:34 PM
The presumption that anyone who cares about cruelty to animals knows nothing about them/has never seen one/is a mung-bean eating greenie is always amusing. Keep deluding yourselves, people. We will put an end to your evil live export trade, it's just a matter of time and legal and strategic process.
Posted by Nicky, 24/10/2011 5:55:35 PM
Good on you Jen, you got it in one!
Posted by Will from Bordertown, 24/10/2011 6:29:35 PM
Yes let's put an end to this slaughter of animals - let's also close down the fish industry - they don't even stun the fish - imagine.

While we've at it lets close down the egg industry - how disgusting eating something that comes out the bottom - oh and mung bean eaters we can also close down all the restaurants that serve fish red meat & eggs - lets also not forget the snails, ants, grasshoppers and bugs.

Now that you have these wonderful ideas we should all live by, please go out and create industries to employ everyone from the closed industries.

Posted by foodforthought, 25/10/2011 11:33:39 AM
Agree Nicky! It is amazing how these "Peoples of the Land" criticise and generalise about anyone who cares for animals or the environment.

The very people you would expect to care about the animals they raise and the landscape they are living on.

Will be interesting to see what happens when the mining companies move in. I guess they think Mr Abbott will protect them. Fat Chance!! Mind you they probably won't care as long as the mining giants line their pockets with more money!!

Posted by Proud Greenie!, 25/10/2011 12:11:33 PM
I can't understand why there is such resistance to animal welfare improvement from the farming industry. I thought the producers cared about their animals?

If I knew an animal I had raised on my property was going to face hideous treatment and slaughter in the importing country, I would be finding another market quicksmart, or at least looking to work alongside groups such as the RSPCA to make some real changes.

There is nothing in it for me, I want to see this trade banned because I care. I thought farmers did too.

Posted by VJ, 25/10/2011 1:30:32 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...