News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Three BSE beef import risk assessments underway 

Three BSE beef import risk assessments underway

15 Apr, 2010 07:01 AM
THREE separate risk analyses are underway assessing the health risks of applications to import beef from the United States, Canada and Japan.

Biosecurity Australia commenced the separate risk analyses last week after the countries had applied for market access following a lifting on the restrictions on beef imports from countries which have had bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) on March 1 this year.

Last month the Federal Government caved in to public pressure over the decision and imposed the tough new import risk analysis process to help safeguard public confidence in Australian beef production and the country's quarantine system.

Chief executive of Biosecurity Australia, Dr Colin Grant, said the IRAs form a separate and parallel process to that being conducted by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) to assess potential food safety risks from beef from countries that have previously had outbreaks of BSE.

"In parallel with the FSANZ process, these IRAs will provide reassurance to the Australian community that the potential risks of beef imports from Canada, Japan and the United States have been assessed," Dr Grant said.

Biosecurity Australia will draft the IRA reports with the assistance of an expert panel, and stakeholders will then have 60 days to consider and comment on it.

As part of the IRA process, Biosecurity Australia scientists will visit the applicant countries alongside FSANZ to assess relevant issues.

An independent eminent scientists group will review each IRA within the two-year timeframe.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What assurance can Biosecurity Australia give that their assessment and review processes and recommendations to follow will not be influenced by political pressures?
Posted by JJ, 16/04/2010 7:31:13 AM
Have a look at this story. 'US Gov't: We Failed to Protect Your Beef' http://www.rodale.com/contaminated-beef
Posted by JJ, 16/04/2010 7:38:27 AM
Why would three countries be lobbying the Australian government to access what was a 36 ton market for beef before the BSE ban was in place? Suspicious of MLA and CCA assurances that the imported beef will not affect on our markets? I know I am.
Posted by Brad Bellinger, 16/04/2010 1:46:59 PM
Well Brad for someone who used to be a sort of hero to me standing up to MLA, I am dissapointed in ABA. You know very well an offer to put ABA members in direct contact with ME meat buyers was ignored by you - just like NFF, MLA, AUSTRADE. It would appear some are more interested in owning shares in Agmates where farmers can take out ads (expensive ads) to advertise their stock. Just what farmers don't need are more expenses. They are getting one third of what beef is selling for, if that! Why should they be forced to pay hundreds of $ if they want to try and find other buyers? Why is the ABA web site ONLY promoting Agmates? You would not even put up another link to help farmers for free. What is going on? Farmers deserve better. ABA are getting more like the others each year.
Posted by pm in waiting, 17/04/2010 3:16:19 AM
Can anyone explain to me why Australia would EVER import beef? EVER? Do we not produce enough for our own needs in addition to export?
Posted by TM, 17/04/2010 6:08:09 PM
It is not hard, TM, even if you are not prepared to have an open mind or to use a minimum of brain power. Listen closely; it is called free trade. Do you have any idea of what that means, TM? I seriously doubt it. It is all one way, isn't it, TM: exports good, imports bad, opposers idiots.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 19/04/2010 9:39:29 PM
Come on Brad this is after all your job. You and I agree about MLA etc but I want you to tell us why the members of ABA are paying for Sally for example to earn 50+ when she doesn't even know how to use a computer to give members a decent website to post on. Why are half of ABA x directors + a few still serving I am told heavily invested in shares in Agmates! When ABA give nothing back to members other than a few words of wisdom from you. It's time to look at why it's losing members. You can do much better than this. Rest for a while if you must but get some decent active people involved in the ABA website and let's get cracking to fix this country up!
Posted by Pm in waiting, 20/04/2010 8:34:19 AM
To date the OIE/WAHO assumes that the human and animal health standards set out in the BSE chapter for classical BSE (C-Type) applies to all forms of BSE which include the H-type and L-type atypical forms. This assumption is scientifically not completely justified and accumulating evidence suggests that this may in fact not be the case. When L-type BSE was inoculated into ovine transgenic mice and Syrian hamster the resulting molecular fingerprint had changed, either in the first or a subsequent passage, from L-type into C-type BSE. In addition, non-human primates are specifically susceptible for atypical BSE as demonstrated by an approximately 50% shortened incubation time for L-type BSE as compared to C-type. Considering the current scientific information available, it cannot be assumed that these different BSE types pose the same human health risks as C-type BSE or that these risks are mitigated by the same protective measures. snip... http://www.prionetcanada.ca/detail.aspx?menu=5&dt=293380&app=93&cat1=387&tp=20&lk=no&cat2 http://bseusa.blogspot.com/2010/04/usda-and-oie-out-of-touch-with-risk.html TSS
Posted by flounder, 28/04/2010 7:07:55 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 April, 2010
14 April, 2010
POLL
Q: Have agricultural groups done enough to improve perceptions of farmers among urban consumers?

Yes
(9.5%)

No
(85.9%)

Undecided
(4.5%)

Total Votes: 440
Poll Date: 11 April, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...