News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Burke now demands BSE risk analysis 

Burke now demands BSE risk analysis

08 Mar, 2010 02:54 PM
THE Federal Government has announced it will demand Biosecurity Australia conduct an Import Risk Analysis for beef imports destined to Australia following the easing of restrictions on countries which have had bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE).

The announcement by Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, in Canberra today is a major win for the Opposition and many grassroots farmers who feared the previously announced import assessment would not be rigorous enough to uphold Australia's clean-green disease-free status.

Mr Burke has written to the Director of Biosecurity Australia requesting an Import Risk Analysis for fresh beef (chilled or frozen) from countries other than New Zealand be commenced.

The Government had promised a risk assessment in its recently released import protocols, which included a questionnaire for completion by prospective export nations.

There would not have been any requirement for Australian experts to personally verify the statements, and Australians would only conduct their own inspections if there was further cause for concern.

The change to an IRA will mean Australians will control a more thorough investigation process which could last as long as two years.

The decision will thrill the Opposition which has called for the IRA process to help safeguard Australia's image both domestically and with important export customers, like Japan and Korea.

Peak cattle lobby groups had argued against the need for an IRA because of the length of time such an investigation would take and the burden that would place on international trading partners.

But Mr Burke has now acknowledged the groundswell of community concern surrounding the change in import rules.

"Since the Government decision, there has been considerable community discussion about the methods which would be used to determine protocols for imports," Mr Burke said.

"There has been significant community concern raised questioning whether or not the protocols which were to be put in place, adequately engaged the community and the extent to which they were different from a legislated Import Risk Analysis.

"These community concerns have been brought to me directly through Labor backbench colleagues and through the media.

"I have formed a view that conducting an Import Risk Analysis is the best way of reassuring the Australian community that effective protocols will be put in place to provide for the safety of imports."

Mr Burke said the difference between an assessment and the new analysis announced today is that this is "a formal process with statutory time lines, guaranteed opportunities for community engagement and consultation, and involvement of the eminent scientists group".

"In light of community concern there is considerable benefit in adopting the tried and true method for assessing imports which applies to each commodity.

"The policy which was previously announced, remains in place but the method at arriving at the protocols will have a higher level of formality.

"I remain firmly committed to Australia having rigorous standards in food safety and a science based biosecurity system. This decision will help deliver both."

Shadow spokesman for agriculture, John Cobb, said the decision was a "victory for commonsense" and comes on the eve of a Private Members Bill being introduced to the Senate on the matter.

"This decision to undertake a rigorous science based Import Risk Analysis will ensure that the decision to allow beef in from countries which have had a BSE outbreak will be based an accurate, detailed and factual scientific evaluation," Mr Cobb said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
How about working overtime cattle industry leaders, and get out there and promote our safe beef, and not just to the regulars, where you enjoy your lovely dinners and travel perks. Work harder, we give millions in levies. The damage that has been caused in even our domestic market, needs to be fixed. Promote a BEEF DAY. Where the public in Australia are encouraged to support our industry, sizzle a sexy safe aussie steak. I would also like to see less bias in journalists covering such important articles.
Posted by tj, 9/03/2010 7:00:14 AM
A very late but correct decision Mr Burke, pity that AgForce and the Cattle Council were hell bent on risking our clean green image just for a pat on the back from the US. We produce all the safe disease free meat product we need and have plenty to export. What a pity this did not happen to the pork industry which has been swamped with inferior international pork and it is very difficult with our labelling laws to find Australian pork in the supermarkets.
Posted by Mrs Mac, 9/03/2010 7:29:30 AM
Hear, hear TJ. If there is a winner, it is Common sense
Posted by CR, 9/03/2010 7:55:00 AM
A win for commonsence. Govt and peak bodies must consult. Peak bodies and MLA have poor records of consultation and achievement. Poor journalism was rife about this issue.
Posted by JR Coolah, 9/03/2010 8:25:53 AM
Well said tj!
Posted by tigerdicky, 9/03/2010 8:26:18 AM
Excellent article in the Stock Journal last week by Ian Turner - we should all mail a copy to our MPs!
Posted by AW, 9/03/2010 8:32:39 AM
Honestly, can Biosecurity Australia really be trusted to deliver a non-political review, assessment and recommendation on this matter? Or is this just a tactic by Krudd and Co to secure wider endorsement for its policy to undermine the red meat industry in Australia? The Government has already made its position clear about the importance it places on our food supply, our farmers and protecting our clean and green reputation globally - the only reasonable outcome is to see a complete reversal of that decision with strong support in the Senate.
Posted by JJ, 9/03/2010 8:50:58 AM
Read this. And then ask yourself whether you want to put this decision in the hands of Biosecurity Australia? http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/272285/Biosecurity-australia-walking-a-very-fine-line-on-philipine-banane-import-decision-macdonald.pdf
Posted by JJ, 9/03/2010 9:13:12 AM
it is only possible to wonder about the thought process (or lack of same) and the buffoons involved involved in the process which has resulted in the risk analysis coming after the policy decision. is it any wonder yesterdays ninemsn poll indicated two out of three people had lost faith in the Prime Minister, and therefore presumably his government.
Posted by AJ, 9/03/2010 9:21:30 AM
What's the bet that the analysis says there is no risk?
Posted by Qlander, 9/03/2010 9:56:02 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Should the Federal Government step in and overhaul the corporate structure of Australian Wool Innovation?

Yes
(42.4%)

No
(43.3%)

Not yet
(14.3%)

Total Votes: 413
Poll Date: 07 March, 2010
BLOGS
04 March, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...