News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Swine flu may have market impact on beef producers 

Swine flu may have market impact on beef producers

04 May, 2009 05:06 PM
The impact of the inaccurate references to "swine flu" has been devastating to pork producers, but it could also have negatives for beef producers, according to Dr Derrell S. Peele, an extension livestock marketing specialists at Oklahoma State University.

Dr Peele said consumers who are concerned over pork's safety may temporarily increase their beef consumption, but it is more probable that all meats will be adversely affected by the H1N1 flu.

For instance, the situation could further delay economic recovery in the US and worldwide, making it more difficult for some countries to import beef, pork and other protein, he said.

This could be especially true in Mexico, which is a critically important market for US beef and pork, he said.

Moreover, some countries could use the situation to ban imports of beef and pork, as China and Russia already have, he said.

At this point, there is no real way to anticipate how bad the flu situation will get, and the economic impact is as uncertain for beef as for pork, Peele said, adding that the situation highlights "a never-ending need" to educate consumers and make sure that policymakers "use science rather than emotion" in making policy decisions.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I'm stunned that an 'Oz' rural reporting service would give credibility to a 'story' out of American academia. This is just more 'blatant' beef industry bashing. Shame on you!! Then there's the question of whether the Dr &/or the journalist are vegetarians. Keep it positive.
Posted by STUNNED, 5/05/2009 12:20:11 PM
And to Stunned, I would say I am stunned at the oft-exhibited inability of some people to approach issues with an open mind, with the objective of determining a personal opinion which is based on some level of intellectual input. A couple of questions for Stunned: What part of the report is demonstrably false or "just more 'blatant' beef industry bashing"? Would you accept it is personally insulting to the academic and the journalist (and the news service) involved to raise, without the slightest evidence, the issue of whether they are vegetarians, with the strong inference that their food preferences would change their analysis of this issue? Why do you expect "an 'Oz' rural reporting service" to report only news that you consider to be good news? Do you not understand the role of the press in Australia? Are you unable to manage and deal with news you consider bad news? What part of Dr. Peele's analysis do you consider to be wrong? Perhaps you could tell us why he is wrong, and perhaps, at the same time, offer an apology to the journalist for your insult.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 6/05/2009 8:10:55 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
04 May, 2009
01 May, 2009
04 May, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the swine flu outbreak caused you to reconsider your consumption of pork products?

Yes
(6.9%)

No
(93.1%)

Total Votes: 580
Poll Date: 03 May, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...