News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Unlikely allies fight live exports 

Unlikely allies fight live exports

11 Mar, 2010 06:19 AM
THE Australian meatworkers union has formed an unlikely alliance with animal welfare groups to fight the live export trade, which they say is crippling the Australian meat-processing industry.

The Australian Meat Industry Employees Union said five abattoirs in regional Australia had shut down in the past six months due to a lack of animals, which were instead being sent overseas as live exports.

The industry's workforce had halved to 40,000 workers and lost 150 abattoirs in the past three decades, which union president Grant Courtney blamed on a live export trade that was unfairly subsidised by federal and state governments.

But Lach MacKinnon, chief executive of the Australian Livestock Exporters Council, said abattoir closures and job losses were the result of the global financial crisis and the rising Australian dollar. He denied that the live export industry received government assistance that created an uneven playing field for Australian abattoirs competing for stock.

''That is absolute rot of the highest order as we are not subsidised in any way, shape or form,'' Mr MacKinnon said.

Australia's live exports last year were worth $994 million.

The union yesterday joined forces with the World Society for the Protection of Animals to attack the Rudd Government for its support of the controversial live export trade.

''This has been targeted as an unholy alliance but these people are not the far-left greens who have climbed down from the rainforest and we all agree about changing live export policy,'' union president Grant Courtney said.

He criticised federal Minister for Agriculture Tony Burke for spending taxpayer money on improving animal welfare conditions in the Middle East, which he said should be a prerequisite before Australian animals were exported.

''Why should we be supporting these oil-rich countries in their animal welfare standards when they've got plenty of money?'' he said.

The minister was unavailable for comment yesterday.

WSPA program manager Emily Reeves said the federal government should halt the live export trade both to support Australian jobs and because of cruelty concerns about how they were handled during the journey and at their destinations.

She said a recent investigation in the Middle East had gathered video footage showing that cruelty and mishandling of Australian animals continued despite government and industry efforts to improve animal welfare in the region.

Meat and Livestock Australia's manager of livestock exports, Michael Finuchan, said such scenes were disappointing but said improvements were being made across the Middle East.

''We know predominantly most animals go through a supply chain we are comfortable with,'' he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The meat workers want to be a special case. They want protection the car industry and textile workers don't get. They want farmers to supply stock at give away prices my grandfather got.
Posted by THE FARMER, 11/03/2010 11:02:47 AM
if the live export isnt there then our local abatoirs cut us to pieces not to mention supermarkets ive just bought cattle to stock my property and paid prices for the stock i paid 20years ago live shipping puts a bottom in the market
Posted by shaun, 11/03/2010 11:12:21 AM
This is the real world people learn to live with it. Farmers have to.
Posted by Qlander, 11/03/2010 2:08:42 PM
the meat workers should be very careful, it could come back to bite them, and then there will be no beef industry., which in the long run is all what these animal liberationists are aiming for.
Posted by tj, 11/03/2010 3:16:10 PM
tj you dont know what you are talking about. Every time a person mentions animal welfare they are ...animal liberationists. You are full of a load. Animal Welfare groups on the whole HATE live export because it is CRUEL. EXTREMELY CRUEL. Perhaps the Australian Livestock Exporters Council, should try getting with the times because the slaughterhouses went BEFORE the global downturn which has not really affected AU. Farmers- you are greedy, selfish and indifferent to both animal and human suffering.
Posted by compassionb4greed, 12/03/2010 12:09:08 AM
How unusual. Another union dropkick with his head up his backside. It must be about time someone fitted out a ship as an abattoir and anchored it just outside the 12 mile limit. And hired meatworkers from all over the world to show these clowns what a level playing field really looks like. Urban Australia doesn't give a second thought to 'outsourcing' major parts of their value chains through the use of imported products and services. They do so for the very worthy goal of maintaining international competitiveness but the moment farmers consider the same option they scream like stuck pigs. The proportion of agricultural value chains that comes from low cost imported inputs is very low compared to urban chains. We cant import cheap grass. But if we don't have a competitive processing sector then we don't have an industry at all. The Union movement, to their shame, sat and watched as entire clothing, footware and furniture factories shifted offshore. But those factories and at least half of their Aussie jobs could have been protected by bringing in a quota of low paid foreign workers to lower average labor costs. They demanded all and got nothing.
Posted by Ian Mott, 12/03/2010 7:51:09 AM
So when the boot is on the other foot and there is an over supply of slaughter cattle are we going to see processors maintain high prices . I DON'T THINK SO. Innovate and get better at what you do if you want to know how it works ask a cattle producer!!
Posted by Sam, 12/03/2010 8:13:56 AM
compassionb4greed ... u probably don't appreciate that healthy animals have higher breeding rates hence make more money for farmers. Health is in their interest. U write as if any other business, or individual, in Australia doesn't want to make money or enhance their lifestyle. My guess is you have very little understanding of how much or little money farmers actually make and most likely no rural background or understanding.
Posted by JayDin, 12/03/2010 8:19:13 AM
This whole issue of live exports impacting abattoir viability was dismissed in an excellent study by the BAE (now ABARE) in the late 1980's/early 1990's. It clearly showed that live exports underpinned the viability of the Australian livestock industry and contributed to higher stock populations (and therefore availability for abattoirs). Stop the live export trade and you further negatively impact the future for Australian meat workers. The heat went out of the argument for decades after that. WSPA has stirred up the AMIEU as part of its international campaign to stop Australian live exports. The AMIEU should tread very carefully getting into bed with WSPA and someone in authority there should read the old BAE study!
Posted by watchdog, 12/03/2010 8:24:51 AM
Sorry, but farmers are price takers - which means they just take the best price they can get - just trying to make a dollar and stay in business. No live export means massive loss of jobs in rural Australia. Live export animal loss is less than the animal loss in the paddock, stock are given the best of care to arrive at the destination in top order so claims of cruelty are sheer ignorance made on emotional beliefs, not fact. The constant increases in wages and conditions are the main problems with Australia, and has priced a lot of businesses off shore - so the union are the main cause of Australia's problems. Business is all about making a profit, and now the abbattiors can't make a profit. Profit is a dirty word to unions, but no profit, no jobs, no expansion to create more jobs, leads to no employers. Where will unionists be then. Who will feed Australia? You may want to be vegetarian but growing vegetables is still a business - no profit, no food. Wake up to yourselves.
Posted by Concerned Northerner, 12/03/2010 8:30:51 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
08 March, 2010
09 March, 2010
10 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Should the Federal Government step in and overhaul the corporate structure of Australian Wool Innovation?

Yes
(42.4%)

No
(43.3%)

Not yet
(14.3%)

Total Votes: 413
Poll Date: 07 March, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...