News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 US red meat industry quick to refute cancer link 

US red meat industry quick to refute cancer link

26 Mar, 2009 01:47 PM
Major US meat industry organisations have vigorously refuted the study conducted by the US National Cancer Institute which claims that there is a link between red meat consumption and death.

The American Meat Institute (AMI), National Cattlemen's BeefAssociation (NCBA), National Pork Board and US Department of Agriculture (USDA) have all been quick to call into question the results of the study.

Conducted by the US National Cancer Institute, it claims that there is a link between red meat consumption and death.

AMI executive vice president James Hodges says the findings were based on unreliable self-reporting by the study participants and NCBA Human Nutrition director Shalene McNeill says other factors complicated the study.

"Those with increased risk were also two to three times more likely to smoke, they had under-consumption of fruits and vegetables and they were more likely to be overweight," McNeill said.

"So there were a lot of unhealthy behaviours that complicate the findings in this study.

National Pork Board dietician Ceci Snyder says the study shows a little bit of ignorance in claiming that pork has excessive iron content.

"The iron in chicken and pork is almost identical," Snyder said. "Someone hasn't really looked into the composition data to show that, so that's an argument that shows that they really don't know the facts about meat."

A study conducted by the US National Cancer Institute claims that there is a link between red meat consumption and death.

The 10 year study of more than half-a-million middle-aged and elderly Americans found a 30pc higher death rate from daily consumption of beef, pork and processed meats.

Cancer-causing compounds, too much iron, especially in pork, and saturated fat are all blamed for the linkage.

In contrast, the study concluded that consumption of fish, chicken, turkey and other poultry decreased the risk of death by a small amount.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It is becoming more and more apparent that adopting a vegetarian diet can increase life expectancy, and protect against stroke, obesity, heart disease, and diabetes, the number one killers in the western world.

Just as fatty foods such as meat, eggs and dairy can lead to heart attacks, they can also clog the arteries in your brain.

On average, those who adopt a vegetarian diet are healthier than their flesh-eating counterparts.

Posted by Kathleen, 26/03/2009 6:44:03 PM
The meat & livestock industries will continue to try and defend the indefensible, just like the tobacco industry does.

From my research, these studies did make adjustments for confounding elements, as any credible study does - it is a standard requirement for any quality research.

Here's a list of very valid reasons for not eating meat: - Contributes to heart disease and cancers.

- Highest users of water per kg of all foods with dairy and beef largest MDBC irrigation users.

- Livestock in Australia use vast amounts of land and cause significant and mostly irreversible degradation. - In 2007 some 66pc of the grain harvested in Australia was fed to livestock. This is a ludicrously inefficient way to feed the world.

- Livestock, particularly cattle and sheep, are responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions than all transport.

- Animal cruelty

- No Australian government health or other credible health organisations suggests that meat is needed for good health, because it simply is not.

With climate change, droughts, better education and information, growing awareness of animal cruelty and negative human health consequences, the increase in people eating less animal products or switching to vegetarian diets will continue.

And of course vegetarians rely very heavily on and support rural farmers.

Posted by Food4thought, 27/03/2009 9:31:51 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
25 March, 2009
23 March, 2009
26 March, 2009
25 March, 2009
MULTIMEDIA
24 March, 2009
22 March, 2009
25 March, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe rural property prices will continue to rise despite the economic downturn?

Yes
(38.6%)

No
(54.9%)

Undecided
(6.5%)

Total Votes: 603
Poll Date: 22 March, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...