News 
 National Rural News 
 Machinery and Equipment 
 General 
 Zeroing in seeding practices 

Zeroing in seeding practices

07 Dec, 2009 10:08 AM
ALTHOUGH disc seeders have had their share of teething problems, farmers who have made the switch generally remain convinced of making long-term gains by switching from a traditional knife-point set-up.

Jack Desbiolles, a researcher into sustainable farming systems with the University of South Australia, said that a 2007 survey of farmers using disc seeders found that although there were a number of drawbacks, farmers believed the long-term benefits of going to a zero till cropping system more than outweighed the negatives.

Dr Desbiolles said overall cropping system benefits, primarily in the form of the ability to retain stubble due to the disc seeder’s improved ability to get through crop residue when planting the next year, was the major deciding factor in converting across to discs.

The Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) supported survey into the use of disc seeders found that a whopping 95pc of those using discs used them to plant into retained standing stubble.

“The ability to retain stubble, and by extension, retain ground cover is one of the key drivers in people using disc seeders,” Dr Desbiolles said.

He said reducing the need for stubble management was another spin-off benefit, cutting down on the cost and time involved in either mulching or burning paddocks.

However, the discs are far from the perfect fit for Australian croppers.

Dr Desbiolles said the survey confirmed suspicions that the discs struggled to compete with knifepoint set-ups when confronted with wet sowing conditions and heavy clay soils, while there were also reports of inadequate herbicide incorporation with products such as trifluralin, which requires sowing to incorporate into the soil.

Although the discs are generally well regarded in dry conditions, Dr Desbiolles said farmers had to monitor progress closely to ensure there was adequate ground penetration, especially in hard, dry conditions.

He said advances in technology were being made, especially in the design of discs that work better in wet conditions, which were making discs a more viable proposition.

“There is work with designs such as fluted discs, or tangential discs, which have sown some success in getting through wet conditions.”

With sowing date becoming recognised as an increasingly important part of farmers’ thinking in terms of planting, the ability to cover large amounts of ground quickly and to be able to dry sow is also a big plus for the disc seeder.

“There are time and cost savings, with reduced fuel, seed and labour inputs required,” he said.

The disc seeders also have a strong fit in no-till systems in low rainfall zones, as the stubble retention allows for better moisture savings, allowing crops to germinate in marginal conditions.

No-till systems, in particular the discs, come under fire from some for a perceived lack of weed management options.

However, Dr Desbiolles said generally the lower soil disturbance levels meant fewer weed seeds germinated and that it was not a huge issue.

Overall, he said that while Australian farmers were still getting to know how to get the best out of a disc seeding set-up, most were seeing the good outweighing the bad when the planter was teamed up with a dedicated zero-till farming system.

“There are many zero till technologies and they are constantly evolving with some significant improvements addressing some of the common limitations.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Well done SA farmers, now you need to go the extra mile and look at zero kill and pasture cropping.
Posted by concerned, 8/12/2009 6:52:05 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
06 December, 2009
04 December, 2009
03 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Which do you think is the best method for reducing Australia's carbon emissions?

Emissions Trading Scheme
(8.7%)

Carbon Tax
(11.7%)

Laws regulating behaviour
(7.7%)

Direct Govt investment in renewable energy
(42.9%)

Direct Govt payments for emissions reductions
(5.2%)

None of the above
(23.8%)

Total Votes: 762
Poll Date: 06 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...