News 
 National Rural News 
 Viticulture 
 General 
 Sour grapes at supermarket taste ban 

Sour grapes at supermarket taste ban

08 Nov, 2009 05:01 PM
SHOPPERS will face an age-old conundrum when the first Australian grapes of the season appear in supermarkets this month: to taste or not to taste.

It has long been a tradition for shoppers to munch a grape or two to check their sweetness before putting a bunch in their basket.

But the Australian Retailers Association warns the practice could land consumers in hot water.

"If there is no sample available or no sign to say that you can taste the fruit then, yes, it's stealing," an association spokeswoman said.

"Grapes and other things like nuts are expensive because the price [of shoplifting] is included in the cost."

The spokeswoman said it was unlikely shops would prosecute grape-guzzling customers, but insisted it was not worth the risk.

Woolworths was a little more forgiving with its try-before-you-buy approach.

"Our customers are more than welcome to sample a grape to see the quality, but we would politely ask that if they like the taste, instead of going back for more, that they pick some up to take home," a spokesman said.

The Australian table grape harvest begins in November and runs for about seven months.

Out of season, 16,000 tonnes are imported from the US.

About 120,000 tonnes are produced annually, more than half from Victoria's Sunraysia region.

Of those, about 54,000 tonnes are destined for export, mainly to Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand.

Prices of up to $8 a kilogram are not unusual at the start of the season, but they fall to as low as $4 by the middle of the harvest.

And the industry's message that local grapes are a healthier alternative to processed snackfoods such as lollies and chips appears to be getting through, with the nation's grape consumption up 50 per cent over the past decade to 3.5 kilograms a person a year.

"We promote grapes as a great alternative snack - high in energy and good sugars and good for hydration," a spokesman for the Australian Table Grape Association, Jeff Scott, said.

"When you compare that to, say, a chocolate bar it's a far better alternative and far better value."

But even the growers' group admits that sour grapes can still be a problem for consumers.

Research highlighted in last year's annual industry report said more than 70 per cent of consumers were not confident about the quality of grapes before they bought them.

"The research also shows consumers normally will not buy again for four to six weeks following an unsatisfactory purchase," the report found.

"Inconsistent quality remains a major issue for the industry."

So, to avoid that feeling, what does Mr Scott recommend?

"Grapes are one of those things that consumers do taste before they buy - it's very difficult to stop it," he said.

"Obviously, you can't taste an apple or orange, but with grapes you can pick a berry and if it tastes great you'll buy it. I wouldn't suggest it's legal, but it's what people do."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
A simple brix reading would soon identify the sugar levels and sweetness of the grapes, or any other fruit/veg for that matter. This should be done on farm to avoid harvesting too early. Once in the supermarket the brix reading could be done again and displayed for the consumers to see. I'll be surprised to see this happen as it will show just how some of the produce really lacks quality.
Posted by ggwagga, 9/11/2009 6:25:30 AM
"I wouldn't suggest it's legal, but it's what people do." If anyone went to a checkout, or staff member wandering around, and asked if they could try a grape to check its taste the answer would be 'yes'. Plus, as inferred, the practice is costed into the product. Apart from which, in 99% of cases it is clear from the colour and firmness of the grapes as to whether they are fresh / tasty or over ripe and sour.
Posted by Alternative View, 9/11/2009 7:01:42 AM
Sure - if I can't taste unprocessed, unpackaged and unbranded products like fruit or nuts before I put them in the trolley, I'll reject them after they have been scanned at the checkout and I taste them and find them unacceptable, or I'll taste them when I've paid for them and if they're unacceptable I'll return them for a full refund before leaving the store. Really - what stupid nonsense suggesting that tasting a grape or two or a couple of cashews is a crime when you're there spending probably a hundred or more dollars on groceries. Same thing goes for cold meats from the delicatessen, the scrappy bits they put in the bag quickly from the back of the tray and not the good product on display at the front of the tray. Just tell the checkout operator you don't want them because what the deli assistant put in the bag was not what you saw on display.
Posted by AJ, 9/11/2009 8:47:54 AM
Yes, I can just see the major supermarkets prosecuting paying customers for tasting grapes. What a beat up!
Posted by Qlander, 9/11/2009 9:32:48 AM
It's pointless to taste, as all table grapes nowadays have no taste. Some may be sweet, but have no acidity for balance and are bland with no flavour. They HAVE BEEN bred with only Brix reading as the objective.
Posted by morrgo, 9/11/2009 2:33:15 PM
Our independent supermarket supplies a separate container with grapes for sampling, it shouldn't be that difficult for other stores to engage in the simple practice. As for stealing, it isn't the same situation as when you witness some yob filling his gob with lollies from a bulk food container simply because he's got the munchies.... Indeed Qlander, what a beat up.
Posted by Andrew Phillips, 9/11/2009 5:37:11 PM
I would not touch a grape until it was thoroughly washed. Perhaps people would leave fruit alone if they were made aware of the chemicals they had been sprayed with.
Posted by matt, 10/11/2009 6:29:30 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Has the emissions trading debate changed your voting intentions?

More likely to vote Labor
(10.5%)

More likely to vote Coalition
(47.2%)

Less likely to vote Labor
(12%)

Less likely to vote Coalition
(3.2%)

No change
(21.8%)

Other
(5.4%)

Total Votes: 685
Poll Date: 08 November, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...