News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Breeding the only answer to problem of mulesing 

Breeding the only answer to problem of mulesing

13 Aug, 2009 11:44 AM
FORMER Department of Primary Industry lead sheep geneticist Dr Kevin Aitkins has dismissed the Australian Wool Innovation's new fly strike policy, saying it should stop "wasting time" and get back to original aim of phasing out mulesing by breeding.

Dr Aitkins said the preoccupation with looking for a "magic bullet" alternative for surgical mulesing had detracted attention away from the only applicable long term solution - breeding - and failed to acknowledge the "many" producers who had taken the hard decision to abandon mulesing.

Speaking to Rural Press this week, a frustrated Dr Aitkins also said that mulesing was only ever introduced as an interim measure until breeding solutions were implemented.

As early as 1951 research had commenced comparing high and low wrinkle, which revealed bare breech heritability occurred at one score change every 10 years.

"Enough of this time wasting – let's get back to the original sensible aim," Dr Aitkins said.

Documents from the Joint Blowfly committee in 1940 state "the mules operation must not be regarded as an alternative to the policy of breeding towards plain bodied sheep".

"We dropped the ball when this research at Trangie stopped because what we should be able to identify now an accelerated way under a range of different breeding strategies to get plain body heritability," Dr Aitkens said.

"Any short term alternative, whether it be clips or intradermal will still have the same effect and ignite the question that it is interfering with the animal.

"The only solution is breeding and there is not enough pressure on getting breeding right."

He said producers could already be abandoning mulesing on some sections of their flock such as Merino wethers and crossbred ewes.

"No rocket science here but the net effect will be quite rapid reduction in the amount of mulesing undertaken...not total abandonment of mulesing by 2010 but a very good start."

National producer survey figures indicate 52 per cent of producers have a breeding strategy that involves sourcing fewer wrinkled and more bare-breeched rams.

And, 54 per cent of all lambs in 2009 will remain non-mulesed, up from 32 per cent in 2008, according to Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia.

On that, Dr Aitkins said: "Yes we can follow the slow path and select plainer rams and that's alright, but there are some clever things to do in the short term such as dividing breeding ewes likely to produce progeny that do not require mulesing and this will speed up the selection process."

But he added: "Breeding is a complicated set of arrangements and all the possibilities need to be aired – and they are not."

NSW Department of Industry and Investment's (DPII- formerly Department Primary industries) animal genetics researcher Jessica Richards said preliminary heritability work showed breed work would be "slow", but, then added, at least "its permanent".

Early results from the DPII study uncovered that when reducing average wrinkle score of a flock from 3 to 2.8, the distribution of scores was most important.

"In the flock of average wrinkle score three there were 28pc four and five score (very wrinkly animals) and only 4pc one score (plain) animals, but after 10 years (average wrinkle score 2.8) there is only 6pc wrinkle score four or five and 21pc wrinkle score one.

"This means the flock is a lot less susceptible to fly strike, even though the average score hasn't changed much," she said.

Meanwhile, Sam Gill, manager Sheep Genetics said the decade time frame to drop a score was today an "extreme" time frame.

He said with the soon to be introduced Australian Sheep Breeding Values for wrinkle score Australian sheep breeders would have a tool that would "speed up" the genetic progress, and the more producers involved the greater the acceleration of heritability.

Mr Gill said he expected the speed up and development of, and precision of ASBVs for wrinkle score would increase when recorded sheep numbers increased.

Around 12,000 Merino sheep are recorded for wrinkles on Merino Select.

A date for the launch of wrinkle ASBVs has not been set.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Dr Atkin, please stop trying to interfere in our businesses. Stop trying to impose your philosophies on the majority of woolgrowers. If you want to stop mulesing on your property, fine. This type of big brother attitude has plagued this industry since day one.

No more interventionist policy, please. Let the free market decide and these issues will sort themselves out.

Posted by jim hawkins, 13/08/2009 8:17:43 AM
It would raise a lot of issues, however.

If the gene sequence that produces these bare breech could be isolated and so rapidly increase the number of sheep with the desirable trait, should GM sheep become a way to address muelsing?

Or would the animal rights activists take a stand against this, too?

Posted by CT, 13/08/2009 8:49:48 AM
Tampering with nature is not the way to go!
Posted by tigerdicky, 13/08/2009 8:58:34 AM
CT, given that their stated desire is to shut down all animal farming, you can bet that they would do everything in their power to oppose fast tracked genetic gain in bare breached sheep via gene sequencing.

I'm not too worried about how many lambs are not being mules now. I would be more interested to know how many lambs will be still not be mulesed five years from now. There are lots of sheep managers out there who have never had to deal with an un-mules flock. Saying 'I will stop mulesing' is one thing. Dealing with the consequences of that is another thing entirely.

Posted by Qlander, 13/08/2009 11:09:53 AM
Since when is hacking off the backside of a sheep without anaesthetic and without pain relief 'surgical?' Animal welfare people come from the angle of what serves the animal best. Mulesing fails to do this. There are other technologies which do not involve invasive and cruel treatments, and some farners are indeed using humane methods.

The Ag Dept in WA-DAFWA has stopped mulesing on all its research stations because they state that mulesing is not necessary. And it is clearly not. The issue here is that farmers do not want to meet at the table to implement humane management methods, choosing instead to stay with what was used years back because it's cheap and easy.

Perhaps they are scared that should they admit they do not need to mules then it will be clear that they never needed to mules.

And of course the livestock industry cannot have animal welfare people coming up with humane solutions. This is clearly the case to me. So if farmers 'care' for their animals as they claim, why dont more of you join the swelling ranks and stop mulesing?

Posted by heather, 13/08/2009 7:28:12 PM
Dr Aitkins is highlighting the elephant in the room. The vested interests on the AWI board don't want change - one group of them have made fortunes out of breeding sheep that have caused this mulesing disaster. Another group has an interest in mulesing pain relief products. Why do you think the first thing the AWGA dominated AWI board did when they got control was to slash the genetics and breeding programs?
Posted by Sir George, 13/08/2009 7:59:45 PM
Please don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. A plug for genetists and plant breeders - in my lifetime they have done more good in solving food shortages then being part of the problem. There are many ways to skin a cat and if you close your mind you miss the blessing.
Posted by Richie 10, 14/08/2009 6:32:06 AM
Heather, the ag dept stopped mulesing because they are responsible for research and with the industry being bullied that way, up to date data and husbandry of unmulesed animals is needed.

Given the 40-60pc strike rates of last year, clearly non-mulesing is not going well. (...yes, SG, Katanning was lower, at 9pc). My lambs had less then 1pc struck.

Posted by THE FARMER, 14/08/2009 10:34:21 AM
Heather wants us to stop mulesing (with pain relief) despite the facts researched by CSIRO that shows 108 per cent of ewes with breech score 5 will suffer breech strike. They will also suffer 42pc re-strike.

The research also shows that by mulesing (with pain relief) we can eliminate breech score 5.

With time, we are reducing breech scores in our flocks through genetic selection. It is happening now.

Posted by Martin Oppenheimer, 14/08/2009 12:39:38 PM
What about the vested interest of the PETA consultant come commercial Merino breeder and the vested interests of the vegan politics and the vested interests of the political ambitions of the peak council and let's not forget the vested interest (whatever that is) of the commentator? If you are going to put the elephant in the room, put all of him there, not just the bits that suit.
Posted by The Blowfly, 14/08/2009 1:05:54 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
11 August, 2009
12 August, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe the RSPCA's claim that live exports can be ended without significantly hurting the economy?

Yes
(16.4%)

No
(80.2%)

Undecided
(3.3%)

Total Votes: 602
Poll Date: 09 August, 2009
BLOGS
03 August, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...