News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Clips work well and we have proof: AWI 

Clips work well and we have proof: AWI

14 Jul, 2008 02:17 PM
Australian Wool Innovation says anti-flystrike clips are almost certain to be at the top of woolgrowers' animal husbandry inventory post 2010, the year when industry has committed to phasing-out mulesing in Australia.

This was the message today from chairman of Australian Wool Innovation Limited, Brian van Rooyen, and two of the company's sheep and wool research and development experts.

"It's clear from the results that clips will prove to be an important fly strike management tool for a majority of Australian woolgrowers from 2009 onwards," Mr van Rooyen said.

Day 90 results from a major two-year trial conducted on four wool-growing properties in three states will soon be submitted to Australian Veterinary Journal for publication and peer review.

The study, designed to scientifically evaluate the performance of clips compared with mulesing, demonstrated that after 90 days clips came out winners in four key animal management areas.

These were:

• significantly less pain and stress for clipped lambs compared with mulesed lambs;

• lower mortality for clipped lambs compared with mulesed lambs;

• greater, faster live body weight gains for clipped lambs compared with mulesed lambs; and

• clips worked as well as mulesing in flystrike prevention when used with complementary animal husbandry practices such as jetting.

Results from the trials, which began last spring on properties in South Australia, Victoria and NSW, are being recorded and statistically analysed at key stages into the future.

AWI project manager for blowfly control, Ian Evans, said today he expected more positive data would emerge as the two-year study progressed.

"Further measurements will be made during the next 15 months, though these 90-day results from the targeted clip 'positive control' study are a very significant outcome for industry," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Great to hear that AWI has funded some science rather than more management reports. The real issue is not is there less pain than mulesing but is there less pain than doing nothing i.e. compared with sheep getting struck.
Posted by Puzzled, 15/07/2008 11:03:15 AM
Hollow victory here I'm afraid, is AWI now going to develop a clip to remove the tail as PETA will now surely tackle this next. I will never use clips but I could administer pain relief prior to the operation, makes a lot more sense.
Posted by huego, 15/07/2008 1:00:55 PM
This PETA dominated argument really has gone on for far too long, with mainly over-seas people trying desperately to distroy the Australian wool industry. It's about time that the wool industry leaders forgot about PETA, and got on with assisting producers to grow, & market the best fibre in the world as such: "the best fibre in the world".
Posted by Billy, 18/07/2008 11:16:16 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you believe the creation of an emissions trading system poses a threat or opportunity for your farm business?

Threat
(59.6%)

Opportunity
(17.7%)

Unsure - more information needed
(22.7%)

Total Votes: 480
Poll Date: 13 July, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...