News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Industry struggles to end mulesing mess 

Industry struggles to end mulesing mess

12 Jun, 2008 11:36 AM
The wool industry just doesn't seem to be able to untangle the mulesing mess which is seriously damaging its cleasn and green image.

This week, the mulesing merry-go-round turned again as some Australian Wool Innovation board members again voiced their disapproval of the industry agreement to end surgical mulesing by the end of 2010.

"As far as I am concerned there is no deadline, people will still be mulesing beyond 2010 unless we can find real and practical alternatives. I was elected on that platform and I stick to it," AWI board member, Chick Olsson, says.

Joining him is high profile NSW stud Merino breeder, Wally Merriman, who says the 2010 deadline was flawed in the first place.

"AWI is not an agro-political group. We are essentially a research and development company and you can't put a deadline on a research project such as finding an alternative."

The comments may stir up animal activist group, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which has claimed another victory in its revamped anti-Australian wool campaign, announcing sportswear manufacturer, Adidas, would no longer use mulesed wool in its garments.

Just last month AWI sent an open letter to international retailers and wool industry stakeholders confirming "there will be alternatives to mulesing ready for adoption prior to 2010 and they provide very significant animal welfare benefits. Progress is being made on other alternatives such as breeding and selection."

All AWI directors have pledged that AWI will continue to vigorously research alternatives to surgical mulesing in support of the industry’s commitment to the surgical phasing out of mulesing by December 31, 2010, and fully endorse the use of pain relief in the interim.

WoolProducers president, Don Hamblin, says he is frustrated by the ongoing debate.

"This issue for woolgrowers will not go away until we see an alternative that works. Sure, we have pain relief and the people that use it say it is great. We know the clips are not for everybody but the main problem with them so far has been operator error. It is a pity that some growers have given up on the clips."

Mr Hamblin says one of the biggest problems at the moment is the reluctance of retailers committed to wool to actually state it publicly.

"They just don’t want to enter the debate and stir things up."

In the meantime, the role of the Sheep and Wool Industry Taskforce is being reviewed.

It was set up to battle animal activists and protect retailers after the mulesing issue broke out in late 2004.

.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The animal idiot bods have said no to clips. People like Hamblin are causing the mess. Good on Chick and Wally.

Silly Ian McL took on the mulesing thing when it should have been the problem of Animal Health Australia, probably still thought he was minister for defence.

Posted by Mabel Peyton Smyth , 13/06/2008 9:36:14 AM
I find it very difficult to understand how the wool industry can claim to be "clean and green" in the first place, when they are directly responsible for killing millions of our kangaroos every year. If they just shut up, spent some money, and got on with finding an alternative to mulesing, everybody would be much happier.....and overseas companies might go back to buying their wool.
Posted by Patrick, 13/06/2008 10:07:27 AM
Conservative surgical mulesing with pain relief must remain acceptable practise for wool growers until real alternatives are available. Forget 2010.
Posted by Manason Tintaldra, 13/06/2008 11:02:58 AM
What the wool farmers have found out is that once you get into the business of bloody animal cruelty practises it is very hard to get out.

However, as public concerns about animal cruelty continue to grow, if they do not find an humane alternative to the disgusting practise of mulesing then they won't have a wool farm to worry about.

Posted by slamina evas, 13/06/2008 12:06:30 PM
Whilst mulesing is not ideal, it was developed for a reason and works well. As there is not yet a suitable replacement for mulesing, it is a small price to pay to reduce the incidence of fly strike.

The affects of fly strike on a sheep are absolutely cruel so we need to minimise the risk as much as possible.

Posted by John, 13/06/2008 1:40:51 PM
I find it is fascinating that PETA and the animal welfare lobby are so concerned by lambs having a sore behind for a few hours when women the world over suffer rape, genital mutilation, domestic violence, poverty, hunger etc etc.

There is a good reason for mulesing, let's fix our species behaviour towards its own members first!!!.

Posted by bamb1, 13/06/2008 2:59:34 PM
I see that Manason Tintaldra mentions "pain relief" with mulesing. Was this ever mentioned, let alone given, before pressure was brought to bear on this callous industry? Let us hope the big firms such as Marks & Spencer imitate Adidas et al.
Posted by Marian, 13/06/2008 4:39:35 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...