News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Call for probe on toxic plantations 

Call for probe on toxic plantations

26 Feb, 2010 04:00 AM
Tasmania’s claim as the country’s premier ‘clean and green’ food producer may be in jeopardy following revelations that extensive eucalypt plantations may be poisoning water supplies across the state.

The revelations, aired on the ABC’s Australia Story over the last couple of weeks, say a toxin produced by plantations of Eucalyptus Nitens (Shining gums) have contaminated the George River which provides water to the township of St Helens.

Painstaking research by local GP Dr Alison Bleaney and Sydney based marine scientist Dr Marcus Scammell has identified the contaminated water as responsible for devestating losses in the local oyster industry and possible links to elevated incidences of obscure cancers in the town population.

Following these allegations former Labour party Minister for Forests, Robert Belcher, has called on all political parties to support his call for an independent Inquiry into the toxic effects of the state’s Eucalyptus Niten plantations.

He said a 30 year breeding program to improve E.nitens yields meant these lines now make up 75 per cent of Forestry Tasmania eucalyptus plantations.

With a value in the billions of dollars these now cover 300,000 hectares of the State and are found in 44 of Tasmania’s 48 catchments.

They have also been sold to plantation projects in other states and overseas.

Mr Belcher said the Inquiry was necessary because the toxins from these hybrid trees deny people across Tasmania their rights to safe drinking water, a claim detailed on the ABC program on Monday February 22.

Mr Belcher said parallel investigations by the EPA division of the Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment concluded incorrectly that the toxin occurs naturally and was produced by native forests.

He said the director of Public Health had failed to keep his office informed of the results from independent studies conducted by Dr Bleaney and Dr Scammell.

“We believe an Integrity Commission Inquiry would more likely uncover all the facts of this situation than a royal commission where the terms of reference are set by government.”

The apparent link between plantation eucalypts and toxic water supplies has served to counter earlier fears that water quality was being affected by chemicals sprayed to control plantation weeds and pests.

The findings on water quality and the likely extent of this problems could have significant implications for the state’s food industries and might also hinder further development of irrigation schemes planned for the north of the state.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Eucalyptus nitens used in the vast plantations in Tasmania and elsewhere might be "natural" - just as mosquitoes and malaria are natural, but a monoculture plantation of millions of trees in straight rows is certainly not natural. Here we see a striking example of private profit taking precedence over human and environmental health. The plantations MUST be cleared back from all surface water, beginning with the Georges river catchment, and replaced by mixed natural growth. This will not be easy but I suggest the bill be sent to Gunns.
Posted by Doctor Max, 28/02/2010 10:50:02 AM, on Stock & Land
Lucky it is not NSW with it's Native Vegetation Act where you can't even clear scrubby regrowth.
Posted by daw, 28/02/2010 8:01:06 PM, on Stock & Land
If it were NSW, they might not have been able to clear to plant the things in the first place.
Posted by theerstwhilekate, 11/03/2010 10:11:00 AM, on Stock & Land
Bleaney's evidence will prove baseless. However she has cynically succeeded in co-opting an overly credulous producer of Australian Story for her political ends. The stage managed media explosion may well turn the imminent Tasmanian election. Fair? I think not.
Posted by hugoagogo, 12/03/2010 2:09:55 PM, on Stock & Land
The claims were looked into by an independent group of eminent scientists from the University of Tasmania, Griffith University, Monash University and CSIRO in the first half of 2010.

It was conclusively found that the water quality of the George River is of excellent standard, the cancer rates within the catchment are no higher than the Tasmanian average, and that any concern raised regarding the toxins in water foam was largely due to erroneous sampling techniques in the aforementioned toxicological studies.

Go to

http://www.georgeriverwater.org.au/?base=4486

Posted by mymy, 21/01/2011 8:48:41 AM, on Stock & Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...