News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 End to drought only solution to Coorong and Lower Lake ... 

End to drought only solution to Coorong and Lower Lake crisis, report says

15 Oct, 2008 01:50 PM
ONLY an end to the drought in the Murray Darling Basin will help the environmental crisis in South Australia's Coorong and Lower Lakes, a Senate committee has concluded, although it hasn't stopped some Senators continuing to point the finger of blame at irrigators in Queensland and Northern NSW.

An emergency inquiry to examine options for getting more water to the Lakes has found there's really no water to send there and found "the problems in the Lower Lakes are primarily the result of the current drought".

It said management scenarios would be influenced by how long it is before there was enough rain to deliver adequate flows to the Lower Lakes.

The committee found recent rain in the area had bought the Lakes some time, but found snow run off would be limited and the outlook for the region was still grim until breaking rains eventuate throughout the basin.

"The committee notes that rainfall sufficient to generate enough runoff to increase flows at the lakes end of the system is unlikely in the near future," the report says.

"The committee understands that current models predict a dryer future for the basin which will make reform for the levels of diversions permitted under the Murray-Darling cap more pressing."

The report did look into the possibility of compulsory acquisition of high-security irrigation water as one of the few remaining options for getting water to the Lakes, seeing so little was available on the open market.

However the committee concluded this was "neither warranted or appropriate" the report says.

It concludes rather frankly that "there is not enough water in the system. This is the result of over-allocations, the current unprecedented drought, and the emerging impacts of climate change".

"The situation in the Coorong and Lower Lakes is not unique. Sites right across the Basin are suffering, all users have very little water and the majority of water held in storages is required for very high priority needs or to cover losses."

But not all Senators were happy with the report.

The Greens released a minority report on the Water Management in the Lower Lakes and Coorong Inquiry, recommending 60 gigalitres of fresh water be sourced from the 1500 gigalitres it believes is currently available in the southern Murray-Darling Basin.

South Australian Greens Senator, Sarah Hanson-Young said the Government "has just run up the white flag on this issue".

"If you actually look at the evidence that was presented by witnesses at the inquiry hearings, it’s clear to see that there is enough accessible water in the basin to ensure that we don’t go past the critical tipping point," Senator Hanson-Young said.

"What’s missing from this sorry situation is the political will. It beggars belief that the Government thinks it’s all too hard to source just 60 gigalitres to tide these communities over until spring next year, while we make the necessary changes for the longer-term."

South Australian Independent Senator, Nick Xenophon, also slammed the report.

"If we had one river system, with one set of rules we could ensure an equitable share of water for irrigators and the environment," Senator Xenophon said.

"Right now we have a situation where the eastern states basically take what they like, and South Australia is left facing an economic and environmental disaster."

Environment Minister, Peter Garrett, said it was clear there was very little water anywhere in the basin and it "wasn't helpful" to go blaming individuals or groups in various parts of the river system.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Can someone please explain how a Senate Enquiry can say there is no water in the system for the environment particularly the lower lakes and towns like Goolwa yet we can have increases in water allocations for irrigators?
Posted by TwoDragons, 16/10/2008 11:06:15 AM
It is after twelve as I type this, and have just came from the Sydney Morning Herald report about Wong not knowing who owned Toorale, etc. And the story from Anderson on the board who says they haven't grown anything for years and the number of jobs lost expected to be around a hundred. Not a bad enterprise really. Hasn't grown anything for years and employed a 100 Bourkeans. And the taxpayer has paid for air according to Anderson. All I am interested in is what Green Senators actually looked at that property and what water they saw! And are they sure they were seeing water from that property!?
Posted by philip travers, 20/10/2008 12:24:13 AM
What environmetal crisis are they expectng at present?
Posted by Jojoba, 24/10/2008 2:10:34 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
2010 Beef & Cattle Directory
 
Rural Bookshop
 
S&L Twitter
 
S&L Facebook
 
photo gallery


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...