News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Mining bites into productive farmland 

Mining bites into productive farmland

29/08/2008 3:20:00 PM
The interface between mining and agriculture needs urgent attention, according to AgForce, which is wants to ensure there is fairness and equity in the way landholders are dealt with by explorers and miners, and that sufficient productive agricultural land is available for future food and fibre production.

Incoming AgForce vice president Ian Burnett said it was a concern to the rural sector that maps indicate the majority of prime agricultural land in Queensland is subject to coal, petroleum and gas, or mineral exploration permits and leases.

Mr Burnett said there was little information or readily available support for landholders about what their rights were in relation to mining exploration permits.

This often leaves landholders ill-equipped and uninformed when mining companies arrive on their doorstep, he said.

"There appears to be little protection or security offered by regulators from various government agencies for landholders who are facing negative impacts," Mr Burnett said.

At Rolleston in Central Queensland, the Smith family's agricultural enterprise has been dealing with potential exploration activity for the past 18 months.

Gail Godwin-Smith has found mining companies have little understanding of their impact on farming and grazing operations.

"Because many mining companies don't understand the technical aspects of farming, they are not immediately aware of the short, medium and long-term impact they have on farm productivity," Ms Godwin-Smith said.

"There is also a strong sense that land being explored for coal and other resources is devalued and not as saleable, and this is even more so if resources are discovered."

Ms Godwin-Smith said mining companies should be required to pay the 'true cost' of their impact, especially with the potential loss of productivity due to soil compaction and economies of scale.

"In our situation, if coal is found and a mine becomes feasible, it would be an underground operation," she said.

"We envisage enormous environmental impacts such as subsidence, and being adjacent to a major watercourse – the Comet River – there is potential for subsidence to change the watercourse and it certainly could not be continued to be used as an area to grow crops."

AgForce is accelerating its efforts to ensure further government involvement in helping resolve issues at the mining/farming interface, with the first step being the creation of a new position for a solicitor based within the Legal Aid Queensland's Farm and Rural Legal Service, to assist primary producers with advice on legal issues relating to the resources sector.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Don't you think that it is high time that the law was changed so that the freehold landowner owned the ground and all that is in it? The Govt could still claim its royalties but the mining company would have to buy the minerals from the landowner. This way the landowner has the choice as to whether the land is explored and mined or not.

Anything else will be just biting around the edges and more and more arable land will disappear to the miners each year, never to produce again.

When Captain Cook sailed up the east coast of Aust, there was 2% of the total land mass of Aust suitable for ploughing. In 1990, this had been reduced to 1.5% due to degradation and urban sprawl. Think about it.

Posted by Sally on 29/08/2008 8:42:01 PM
I believe that the situation is based on the colonial heritage that every body has the opportunity to improve there position and that is why the commencement of mining operations on property is discriminating against the land holder.

It was fine to say that prospecting is a right by all but when it infringes on the basic rights of the land holder then this is another matter.

Queensland is the only state which still uses the old legislation which takes the rights of the land holders and places it into the hands of an unknown third party with out consultation.

You have to provide more information when you apply for the dole or a job then you do when applying for a prospecting permit. There are no back ground checks be they criminal of financial required by the mine registrar on the person applying. They only want the payment fee and where you are going and there is no accountability on any out comes by the registrar. The first thing the land holder knows about this is the letter 5 days prior to a total stranger having full access to their property.

I can see this may be ok in the case of leasehold land as the Queensland Government still owners it so the registrar has some jurisdiction as an representative of the government. But in the case of free hold there is another party involved which is the registered owner.

Last week I heard of a town in the USA who were now hitting it big as a gas company was buying the mining rights to the natural deposits under their FREEHOLD PRIVATELY OWNED LAND. Now we see why most of the large mining companies are from the USA and Canada as it is one less cost they have to incur. And who gets the money here QLD Government not the disadvantage land holder.

Maybe AGforce could take this to the if they want more equitable interface. Cheers

Posted by worried on 1/09/2008 8:35:29 AM
There is a very good reason why there is little to no information on landerholder rights in the face of mining and exploration: our government doesn't want us to object. There is too much money in it for them. Farming rights and the environment come second best in spite of the weak as water 'just compensation' and EIS requirements in the legislation. Anna Bligh and Kevin Rudd are not their own boses, they are being led around by the nose by the big money businesses.
Posted by Bruce on 1/09/2008 8:52:02 AM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
26/11/2008 | If we're serious about roo farming, we'll need to start with a breeding program and kangaroo EBVs for marbling and tenderness.
 
QCL Subscriptions
 
APRA National Final Rodeo History
 
QCL Rate Card
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
QCL - Mail Order Cataloge
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...