News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Claims about safety of fire bunkers are false, warns watchdog 

Claims about safety of fire bunkers are false, warns watchdog

14 Oct, 2009 10:37 AM
THE NSW fire authority has warned against installing fire bunkers until national standards have been developed - on the same day the consumer watchdog clamped down on bunker manufacturers making false claims about their products.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has pursued three manufacturers who claimed their products met Australian safety standards, when none exist.

The businesses, all in Melbourne, spruiked the safety credentials of their bunkers by quoting building code standards that referred to standards for septic tanks, explosives and concrete structures.

The chairman of the ACCC, Graeme Samuel, said his organisation had only "scratched the surface" of erroneous claims being made in an industry that has grown significantly since the Black Saturday disaster this year: "This isn't just about people being duped into spending money improperly, it's about believing they're safe and secure and that their families are safe and secure from the ravages of a bushfire."

Seven people died in bunkers during the Victorian disaster, while many others credited the structures with saving their lives.

The three manufacturers have since removed the claims.

The Australian Building Codes Board is expected to release national standards next year.

The Assistant Commissioner with the Rural Fire Service, Rob Rogers, said householders should wait until those standards have been delivered before installing a bunker in their home. "It may well be that bunkers have a place, but we believe there needs to be some national standards on those before people go to the trouble of installing them.

"People may put their faith in something that does not provide as much safety as if they had left the area," he said.

Manufacturers the Sydney Morning Herald spoke to welcomed the new guidelines. Craig Morrison from Fire Proof Shelters - which was not found to be breaching standards - said his company strived to ensure the quality of its products by using individual components that met other fire safety standards, and stressed they were not a full-proof solution.

"We tell people this is your last resort, if they can get out then do, but what happens if a fire starts up overnight?" he said.

Mr Samuel said even recommending the safety of individual components was a "grey area".

"A fire door that meets 'industry standards' may well be an industry standard for an office door or a residential door, but whether that is satisfactory to meet the extreme conditions of a bushfire is another issue."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The fire bunker cannot protect the occupants unless it is fitted with a water and compressed air supply for up to six persons including the pets for 40-50 hours, and is adequately insulated for the task. It is on record that during a NSW fire several years ago a woman and her 2 children jumped into the swimming pool but did not survive, not because of drowning but because the fire consumed the oxygen long enough to asphyxiate them.
Posted by Robert Stewart, 15/10/2009 5:39:30 AM, on Stock & Land
So it's better to wait and risk a bushfire season without a bunker than risk installing a bunker without a bureaucratic tick?

Common sense tells you it needs to be big enough to fit everyone in comfortably. It needs to be well insulated. It needs to have water and needs to have air. But the bureaucrats haven't worked that out yet so you'd better wait until after the next bushfire season before you start installing anything like that!

Posted by Qlander, 15/10/2009 9:25:11 AM, on Stock & Land
I agree, Robert, oxygen supply is essential but 50 hours is way over the top. Most fire storms pass in half an hour, many in 15 minutes. As usual, the industry and bureaucrats will devise a solution that is so expensive that no-one can afford it.

The lessons from 1939 show that a quick deep hole in the ground and a good cover of sod can save a life in an emergency. Add the air in a spare tyre, some water spritzers with larger water reserve and survival chances improve considerably.

The key is to modify existing assets to lower costs and increase the proportion of people who implement the measures. Increase the costs and fewer people take up the solution.

A thicker, reinforced slab under a water tank makes an ideal place for a small tunnel and chamber underneath that is usually sufficient distance from the house. The combined thermal mass of water and slab will absorb most of the heat. Ditto for a reinforced slab under a car port.

Deliberately oversized pipes in nearby box drains can fit a few people (and spare tyres if you don't have a cylinder). A small sheet of tin and dirt to plug one end and pre-make a plug for the other. Record all assets of opportunity in the fire plan.

Posted by Ian Mott, 15/10/2009 11:06:36 AM, on Stock & Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Shelter ... a bunker used by a family during the Victorian bushfires.
Shelter ... a bunker used by a family during the Victorian bushfires.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 October, 2009
13 October, 2009
POLL
Q: For which levy rate will you vote at this year's WoolPoll?

0%
(43%)

1%
(9.9%)

2%
(32.2%)

2.5%
(4.5%)

3%
(10.5%)

Total Votes: 314
Poll Date: 11 October, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...