News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Duck-hunting season extended 

Duck-hunting season extended

01 Jan, 2010 07:48 AM
DUCK-SHOOTING season will be longer in Victoria next year than in 2009, thanks largely to a rise in bird numbers at a single location in South Australia.

The season will start on March 20 and run to May 30. And shooters will be allowed to kill more birds.

The State Government said expansion of the season was possible because of increased bird numbers, but stressed that the season would still be shorter - and have lower bag limits - than seasons before the recent years of drought.

But the expert whose bird surveys helped inform the decision said it was unclear whether there had been any rise in bird numbers in Victoria during the past year.

Surveys are typically done across eastern Australia, meaning that bird populations in Victoria, Queensland, NSW and South Australia are combined into one survey.

Surveys led by University of NSW professor Richard Kingsford are widely accepted as the best guide to bird numbers, and one of his reports from October was used by the State Government to guide yesterday's decision.

Professor Kingsford said that although his survey found a slight increase in bird numbers in eastern Australia, that result was largely due to a single breeding event near the Coorong in South Australia.

''It's very unlikely bird numbers in Victoria have increased more than last year's numbers; they're more than likely on par with last year,'' he said. ''This is now a string of really dry years in Victoria, so the birds are unlikely to be breeding there.''

He said combining survey information from across the states meant the localised picture could be overlooked.

''It hides the patchy nature of the numbers,'' he said.

Anti-duck-hunting campaigner Laurie Levy said surveys in the states were important, but Victoria needed to conduct more localised surveys.

''Victoria needs its own waterbird count,'' he said. ''With climate change, native waterbirds are going to be struggling in the years to come, so it seems amazing the Brumby Government is allowing the recreational shooting of birds just as a fun thing.''

But Field and Game Australia chairman Russell Bate said the breeding in South Australia was ''totally relevant'' to bird abundance in Victoria.

''Most of Australia's game birds are not territorial; the prime game species migrate all around Australia,'' he said.

Mr Bate said the length and conditions announced for the season - shooters will be able to take eight birds each trip compared with last year's limit of three - were a reasonable compromise and were getting back to a normal season, where bag limits were as high as 10.

The Government defended the season, saying some counting of waterfowl was conducted locally in November and more would occur in February before specific wetlands were deemed open for hunting.

''On balance, the Government is convinced hunting will not adversely affect populations of ducks at the levels allowed for the 2010 season,'' acting Environment Minister Tim Holding said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
To allow another duck shooting season in 2010 by the Brumby Government just to appease shooters is criminal. What with the drought wetlands drying up everywhere and waterbird numbers so low it is totally irresponsible. A sad day for our native waterbirds and a step backwards for wildlife in the State of Victoria.
Posted by Kathleen, 2/01/2010 7:41:06 PM, on Stock & Land
Breeding pairs of wood ducks successfully raising 12 to 14 young was common on our property this past breeding season. In the past they have usually only raised 4 to 6 each.
Posted by ggwagga, 4/01/2010 9:05:50 AM, on Stock & Land
The season decision was politically based, not on science, surveys, public opinion or common sense. The Brumby government wants to ensure the shooting lobby continue to vote Labor. Our wildlife matter little to them. If they got out of their offices and went to the wetlands when the waterbirds return they would notice the lack of breeding pairs and the flocks that used to fill the sky. Despite the DSE who are responsible for wildlife, their protection is just given tokenism.
Posted by Vivienne, 8/01/2010 4:18:43 PM, on Stock & Land
Kathleen you are wrong in so many ways. Firstly wetlands are starting to come back with rainfall back to normal levels over the last few months. Native waterbirds have taken advantage of this and other flooding events around the country by increasing their breeding rate. The decision by the government is backed by good science and is balanced with nature. I would expect that as conditions continue to improve in 2010 that the 2011 duck season will return to the full legislated 12 week season with 10 duck bag limit.
Posted by Adam, 10/01/2010 1:09:22 PM, on Stock & Land
Duck shooting is not a sport: its cowardly, anti-social, unnecessary and cruel ! Hunters pollute waterways and terrify wildlife, just because they are insecure about their masculinity. Hunting has no place in a civilised and compassionate society !
Posted by Only cowards like bloodsports !!, 14/01/2010 4:27:12 PM, on Stock & Land
Waterfowling is a means to procure free range natural food in a humane way. Wild ducks are only shot as a food source and choice. There are many regulations to abide by to protect the environment and species. There is no professional hunting permitted. It is practiced by a wide range of society. There is no threat to duck species from hunting. Non toxic shot is used. It is no different to fishing. Waterfowlers being insecure about masculinity is a very immature observation and comment.
Posted by Waterfowler, 19/01/2010 1:56:58 PM, on Stock & Land
Sorry but using that whole free-range thing is meaningless when you can actually buy it. Wild ducks are killed for fun, not food. You just use that as a justification, the reality is you enjoy it. Recreational duck-shooting has already been banned in 3 states because it’s inhumane, destructive to the environment and surrounding wildlife and a threat to species.
Posted by Only cowards like bloodsports !!, 20/01/2010 4:40:38 PM, on Stock & Land
Dear "coward" - something wrong with enjoying hunting, fishing and gathering food as a social activity and eating produce straight off the land and sea?? A practice undertaken and supported by the majority. By the way, you cannot purchase wild ducks, you can only obtain them from hunting. There is also a code of conduct for hunting/killing humanely and suggest you study a bit more on species mortality as it is widely recognised that hunting is not a threat to the species. How could it be if half of Australia is a permanent sanctuary??? And on your other statement about destruction to the environment you may want to educate yourself on all the wetland rehabilitation and waterfowl breeding projects undertaken by Field and Game associations. Perhaps some emotion getting in the way of facts - enough said.
Posted by Waterfowler, 20/01/2010 6:31:51 PM, on Stock & Land
To "fowler", enjoying killing is disturbing at best. How about you try nature walks for a social activity where you observe nature not destroy it. ‘A practice undertaken and supported by the majority.’ No, a practice undertaken by the disturbed minority is a better statement. Well I’m not surprised Field and Game would want to be a part of breeding water birds. Breed ‘em up, shoot ‘em up, right ?? But of course you have to do something, it wouldn’t look right if all you bring to the peaceful wetlands is death and destruction would it ??
Posted by Only cowards like bloodsports !!, 21/01/2010 4:58:20 PM, on Stock & Land
To "coward", plenty of lovely environment soaked in on hunting and fishing expeditions - also part of the reason why we do it. Love our nature walks as well. And yes we are very active in preserving the environment so we can continue to enjoy it and hunt and fish and look after it for future hunters and fisherman. Haven't seen any animal liberationists on these projects to date. As an example Bool Lagoon only exists today because of lobbying of Field and Game many years ago otherwise it would have been drained as part of the south east drainage scheme. Look at all the other waterbirds, fish, reptiles not hunted that also benefit. And look at all the Watervalley Trust wetland rehabilitation work done by hunting organisations in the south east. Perhaps you should join in and look for a win/win so this work continues by Field and Game so you and all else can also enjoy these wetlands when not hunted - which is most of the time. Good to see you have recognised that hunting is not a threat to the species and in fact is a significant contributor to the species future.
Posted by Waterfowler, 21/01/2010 5:53:05 PM, on Stock & Land
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...