News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Farmers denied a say at bushfire Royal Commission 

Farmers denied a say at bushfire Royal Commission

21 Apr, 2009 04:38 PM
Farmers will not be represented at the Bushfires Royal Commission after the Victorian Farmers Federation's application to appear was rejected.

A list of those granted leave to appear has been released and includes organisations such as the Australian Workers Union, while blocking farmers and the forestry industry.

VFF president Simon Ramsay was "shocked and disappointed" with the decision, given the key role that farmers play in land management and fire prevention.

"The Victorian farming community has been one of the worst affected groups in the wake of the Black Saturday bushfires," Mr Ramsay said.

"This is an appalling decision by the Commission who are essentially placing a higher value on the evidence of the unions than the evidence of farmers and the forestry industry.

"The fires did not start in a union office, they started in rural Victoria and it is appalling that farmers who survived this tragedy will not have the opportunity to present their experience."

According to the VFF, 1500 of its members live in areas affected by the fires.

"For years, the VFF has been at the forefront of lobbying on related issues including the Fire Services Levy and Native Vegetation Regulation. It is only sensible that these issues again be raised in the context of the state’s highest-level of judicial inquiry," Mr Ramsay said.

The Victorian Association of Forestry Industries has also been denied an opportunity to present to the Royal Commission.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Who is actually controlling submissions to the Royal Commission? Cui bono? (Who benefits)? By denying submissions from the farmers and ALL affected parties, this Royal Commission will go down in history as the most corrupted of all. Who is hiding what?
Posted by Trugger, 21/04/2009 6:28:23 PM
Very poor form once again by the Labor Party. As usual keeping any rural based groups on the outer. Labor would rather country areas been seen and not heard, using them to applease city greenies by covering them with wind turbines that don't work and building useless pipelines with no water!
Posted by bill,, 21/04/2009 9:20:43 PM
How dare they!!!!! Farmers and forestry are the first line of defence for most rural communities facing the onslaught of bushfire. We ARE the rural fire brigades of whom fight the fires. We ARE the hazard reduction teams who often own the equipment to install fire breaks, back-burns and hazard reduction burns. What is the commission afraid of? Perhaps the truth that the green policies adopted have been largely responsible for the loss of property, wildlife, vegetation and life in these tragic fires. Those towns have been there for a long time and did not burn when they were logging towns. Heatwaves in Victoria in summer, now that is a surprise......... When this tragedy occured, all were told that they would be given a say at the enquiry, so why not the biggest stakeholders? Shame on you all!! LIFE WILL BE LOST AGAIN, LESSONS NEVER SEEM TO BE LEARNED!
Posted by Rebecca Dance, 22/04/2009 7:52:12 AM
Not surprising. This commission is obviously so restricted in its terms of reference, it will amount to another white wash of years of atrocious governement policy. For years we complain about the inequity of fire levies on our farm insurance, we are restricted by misguided green policies on clearing our land and reducing fuel loads. Our families, through membership of the CFA, are expected to help the Dept of Sparks & Embers (DSE) when they get in wrong or want to knock off at 5pm. The beast of burden no longer has 4 legs, it has 2 and is predominently a farmer.
Posted by ann b, 22/04/2009 8:06:10 AM
This natural disaster will be used the Government of the day as an excuse to increace its control and absolve it from any responsibility. This is normal, just look at a history of past disasters both natural and man made. This Royal Kangaroo Court will be VERY selective in what it accepts and is acting under rider's orders to produce a result that will offer the current government extra control over land use, entrench the militant unions and some green groups in the decision making process while protecting all of them from any responsibility. The result will be like all others of its ilk before it. Too many recomendations to implement, impractical recomendations, absolution for government and planners, added costs to the general taxpayer who does not even live there and no practical progress in developing planning and controls to ensure people can continue to live in these fire prone areas with exceptable risk and no added cost to the taxpayer.
Posted by Geoff D, 22/04/2009 9:05:08 AM
This is not a true Royal Commission. It sounds more like a kangaroo court. The volunteer bush fire fighters must now be a more important unionised industry than farming or forestry. How much money do they contribute to our economy? How much does this new industry cost us? Will they have to pay carbon taxes for all the bush fire smoke and CO2 pollution?
Posted by Grazeorburn, 22/04/2009 9:18:37 AM
Anything organised by Brumby was going to be a cover-up.
Posted by denis, 22/04/2009 9:34:39 AM
One day these pollies will have to face a higher judge where they will not be able to hide.
Posted by genazzano, 22/04/2009 6:29:41 PM
Sure looks like the mother-of-all cover-ups. Necessary though to cover the backside of the greens and the D.S.E. who are a major part of the problem. Two seperate fire services in one state; one with a mis-guided green agenda is a recipe for trouble to start with. I believe a truly objective Royal Commission would soon uncover this and make the appropriate recommenations. The Brumby Govt. certainly wouldn't want to hear that!
Posted by Dave, 22/04/2009 9:23:11 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Do you think tree changers generally have realistic expectations of rural life when they move to the bush?

Yes
(9.8%)

No
(89%)

Other
(1.2%)

Total Votes: 764
Poll Date: 19 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...