News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Holding harangued 

Holding harangued

04 Feb, 2009 04:56 PM
Water Minister Tim Holding was given a fiery reception at a Rural Press Club of Victoria lunch in Melbourne on Friday, as opponents of the Government’s water policy took over question time, usually reserved for the media, to condemn the Government’s actions.

Representatives from the Victorian Water Forum, anti desalination groups and Plug the Pipe waved placards outside the luncheon and used question time to vent their anger at Government plans to build a desalination plant and the 70-km north south pipe to carry water from the northern irrigation districts to Melbourne.

Plug the Pipe spokeswoman Jan Beer accused Mr Holding of double standards in refusing to dam the heritage-listed Mitchell River in part because of the environmental impact, while pushing ahead to extract water from the similarly heritage listed Goulburn and pipe it to Melbourne.

Mr Holding said desalination represented the only guaranteed means of securing new water for Melbourne as alternatives such as building a dam on the Mitchell, installing rainwater tanks across Melbourne and piping water from Tasmania were either rainfall reliant, environmentally destructive, too expensive, or in the case of the Tasmanian pipe not secure.

“Where it fundamentally falls down is that the Tasmanian Government would not guarantee us access in perpetuity,” he said. “It is on record as saying its highest priority is securing water for its own residents.”

Mr Holding said in the context of less rainfall and growing population dams were not a strategy that would sustain the city into the future.

“We want to move away from an almost total reliance on surface water collected in dams and reservoirs,” he said

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
As predicted, Mr Holding in his capacity of Water Minister is proving that he can be equally as incompetent in his current ministry, as he was during his tenure as Minister for Police and Emergency Services.

One of the primary excuses he uses (cost) to exclude alternatives to the desalination plant, is the major reason why a desalination plans should be the last option.

A desalination plant consumes enormous amounts of energy to operate, causing even more greenhouse gas emissions to spew into our already polluted atmosphere.

There are many options, far more cost effective and certainly more evironmentally friendly being ignored, without legitmate explanation from Holding and Brumby.

So why is this government embracing it and happy to damage a pristine part of our coastline?


Posted by CQ, 5/02/2009 8:06:24 AM
I am pleased the government is taking positive action in light of what the current climate is and the future predictions.

Modernisation gets a big tick and it will save water.

Dams. We have plenty of them, in fact, we have capacity for seven times Melbourne's consumption - but it isn't raining, therefore what would another dam achieve.

Desal - not my prefered option, but in the context of the climate, absolutely neccessary and a very courageous decision by the government

Posted by Ando, 5/02/2009 10:32:31 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 16GB56 plans 17%
2) Apple iPhone 4 32GB53 plans 16%
3) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB37 plans 2%
4) Samsung Galaxy S44 plans 3%
5) HTC Desire4 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

FOL EMAIL SUBS


WA
NSW
SA
QLD
WA
QLD
SA
NSW

Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...