News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Massive carbon sink in Victoria 

Massive carbon sink in Victoria

16 Jun, 2009 09:22 AM
The world's most carbon-dense forests are not in the tropics, but in a protected mountain catchment that supplies Melbourne's drinking water, new research shows.

A five-year study by the Australian National University of more than 130 forest sites around the world found these wet mountain ash forests just over an hour's drive from the Melbourne Cricket Ground store twice the amount of carbon as a tropical rainforest.

The cool, moist temperate forests of the O'Shannassy catchment, which includes the headwaters of the Yarra River, store just under 2000 tonnes of carbon a hectare in their giant 300-year-old mountain ash eucalypts, lush understorey vegetation such as tree ferns, and in dead wood on the forest floor.

But as the trees age, the figure rises, with trees more than 250 years old boosting the carbon sink capacity to just over 2800t a hectare.

The unexpected findings, published online today in a National Academy of Sciences journal in the United States, have critical implications for climate policy in the lead-up to the United Nations climate conference to be held in Copenhagen later this year.

The research paper, by ANU ecologists Heather Keith, Professor Brendan Mackey and Professor David Lindenmayer, over-turns conventional theories on the role of forests in carbon accounting.

Professor Mackey said: "It identifies a gap in climate change policy that Australia needs to address.

"There has been a lot of talk about the need to address tropical deforestation in developing countries, but these results show we must start by recognising the carbon benefits to be gained from protecting our native forests," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Then why does the government FullCAM model give such low results for these forests? An analysis of FullCAM results shows that it is constantly 50% lower than models used by the NSW State Forests, up to 6 times lower than that used by the CO2 group. Someone is wrong. The government is going to use FUllCAM so CO2 group will not make anywhere near the carbon permits they propose to farmers - not that it matters to the farmers as the CO2 group take all the risks and rights - but it might matter to investors. And how does a landholder really know what they are selling? The government needs to get some clear rules on forests and modelling so landholders can at least get some of the benefits of forestry.
Posted by the lorax, 17/06/2009 11:10:08 AM
Has LANDCARE or other revegetation groups looked into the benefits of re-establishing these stands of forest giants? A replanting of slow growing behemoths such as red cedars throughout the sub tropics would store carbon for hundreds of years, and maybe give the nurseries hit by Timbercorps collapse some work. I know, it's crazy talk.
Posted by see darr, 18/06/2009 9:05:00 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Professor David Lindenmayer
Professor David Lindenmayer

Most popular articles




Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...