News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Post-fires grievances finally aired 

Post-fires grievances finally aired

19 Mar, 2009 01:42 PM
A lack of warning, poor mobile phone reception and little apparent co-ordination between emergency services have been among the grievances aired at the first community consultation into the Black Saturday bushfires.

About 60 people filled a function room at the Savoy Club in Myrtleford yesterday to take part in round-table discussions, which were closed to the media.

Dozens of homes around Myrtleford were destroyed in the fires, which burned through 31,000 hectares of land, and killed locals John and Sue Wilson.

After the consultation ended, residents emerged to describe what had occurred behind closed doors.

Many said that talk had unfairly turned into a "CFA (Country Fire Authority) witch-hunt" after residents complained fire crews pulled out of affected areas too soon on Black Saturday.

"I'm wondering – how many of those people, the younger ones who are complaining, are actually volunteers?" Upper Gondwaring resident Rosemary Garoni said.

She and her husband, Sil, lost pasture when fire hit their horse farm and came within metres of their home, but they credit a CFA dozer with helping save their house.

The lack of mobile phone coverage in areas such as Mudgegonga appeared to be one of the biggest concerns, with residents saying another mobile phone tower was desperately needed to improve communication in emergencies.

Many also questioned why a widespread alert had not gone out to those in areas threatened by fire.

"There just didn't seem to be enough going on that should have been," Barwidgee Creek resident Vicki England said.

"Some people saw fire brigades some didn't, some got warnings some didn't.

"I think there could have been more preparation done to make it more co-ordinated."

But Ray and Lorraine McCarthy, who lost their house, sheds and many hectares of grazing pasture when the fire bore down on their Mudgegonga farm, said there was little that anyone could have done to prevent the weekend's events.

"We could have a beef with (the CFA) too, for not letting us know but what's the point? It's not going to bring our house back, it's not going to do anything else," Mrs McCarthy said.

The efficacy of the consultation process, which saw the crowd broken up into groups of eight to 10 people with overall discussion facilitated by a moderator, drew mixed reviews.

Participants were asked to consider four questions:

• What was the impact of the fires?

• What did and did not work to prepare them?

• What should be done to better prepare in the future?

• What would help assist the community to rebuild?

Rosemary Garoni said she thought people should have an opportunity to speak their minds. "It helps with the trauma," she said.

However, Lorraine McCarthy, who, with husband Ray and adult daughter Anissa, fled the fires as a tree crashed through their roof and sent flames shooting through their home, said the meeting had achieved little for her.

In his opening remarks chief commissioner Bernard Teague said the aim of the consultations was to help the commissioners know what areas to prioritise under their "extraordinarily wide" terms of reference.

A royal commission had been called, he said, to prevent further loss of life in the future on the scale of the February 7 fires.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
As a fomrer resident of the "Shire of Fire," (Shire of Yarra Ranges) who along with my local CFA brigade, Police and community members, campaigned for years for a greater emphasis to be placed on achieving a more significant levels of ground fuel reduction burning, I can safely say that the current government and many more before it knew of the impending risk and chose to dismiss our concerns, downplay, then ignore the significant risks.

This catastrophe was a direct result of approximately 60 years of Victorian State Government neglect. Since the Royal Commission into the 1939 fires, numerous other committes and investigations have advised government that they were failing to undertake sufficient ground fuel reduction burnoffs.

The Government refused to heed that advice, refused to listen to concerned locals and CFA brigades where office bearing volunteers with 30 and 40 years of experience and local knowledge were patronisingly dismissed as being alarmist.

The government and local shires (who have been infiltrated by an extremist and idealogical green element) instead chose to appease and entertain green elments in return for their vote, whilst placing everyones safety at risk.

The fact that the Royal Commission is to be conducted behind closed doors is clear indication that John Bumby plans to suppress the truth surrounding the level of his government's complacency, negligence and culpability.

On that basis, I fear Victoria shall be consigned to other tragedies like this again in the years to come as the Royal Commission findings will be sanitised and watered down inorder to abrogate government's responsibility.

Cynically the government has already moved to change laws and regulations govenring dwelling types allowed to be built in fire prone areas. Had the government repsonsibly fulfilled their obligations to the people of Victoria and ensured sufficient fuel reduction burns were conducted, the fires we have just experienced would have been quite insignificant or potentially wouldn't have occurred.

The people of the muncipalites affected were disgracefully failed by their elected officials and I hold nothing but contempt for the moronic Green Extremists and also for Messers Brumby, his predecessor Bracks and his predecessor Kennett who were the most recent 3 amigos responsible for the situation. Regardless of spin doctor derived press releases or a heavilly censored Royal Commission, no matter how hard they try to wash their hands, the blood will never come off.

Posted by CQ, 20/03/2009 4:04:49 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
From left: Ron McLeod, Bernard Teague and Susan Pascoe.
From left: Ron McLeod, Bernard Teague and Susan Pascoe.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
18 March, 2009
19 March, 2009
POLL
Q: If a federal election were held on Saturday, which party would you vote for?

Labor
(16.8%)

Liberal
(40.5%)

Nationals
(25%)

Greens
(8.6%)

Family First
(1.3%)

Independent
(5.9%)

Other
(1.8%)

Total Votes: 1043
Poll Date: 15 March, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...