News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 VFF slams Gene Ethics for invading farmers' privacy 

VFF slams Gene Ethics for invading farmers' privacy

12/08/2008 8:56:00 PM
The Victorian Farmers Federation has labelled moves by anti-GM group, Gene Ethics, to place a list of names and property locations of farmers supposedly growing GM canola on their website as a disgraceful invasion of privacy.

The VFF claims the map includes the property location of Victorian Premier John Brumby.

VFF president, Simon Ramsay, said the release of unconfirmed maps of supposed GM canola sites with the names of property owners was appalling.

"This is a disgraceful and unsubstantiated witch hunt and shows how few ethics, Gene Ethics really have," Mr Ramsay said.

"Farmers have as much right to privacy as any other citizen, and Bob Phelps and his gang of activists have no excuse for breaching it.

"Gene Ethics claim that this is some sort of public service is self serving nonsense.

"Even if GM canola was being grown at these locations, the reality is that all relevant authorities have approved of the technology and allowed farmers the choice."

According to AAP, Mr Brumby has denied his wife is growing GM crops at the farm, and has asked for the Gene Ethics Network to respect farmers' right to choose.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Simon Ramsay does himself and his constituents no favours by giving Gene Ethics so much free publicity.

By squealing so loudly he invites the public to think that growing GM canola is something shameful that should be conducted under a cloak of secrecy and not an honourable, legal pursuit.

Most farmers I know are proud of their produce and would be mortified to think that their elected representative would imply that they are involved in an activity "that dares not speak its name" .

Posted by Al Zymerz on 12/08/2008 6:38:43 PM
I would agree with VFF if the growers of GM crops could control the spread of their GM genes to other properties. Is not the lack of control of GM and its contamination and detection costs in non GM produce an invasion of privacy also?
Posted by grapegro on 13/08/2008 8:40:58 AM
Thanks for nothing Mr Ramsey. My concerns are worth nothing then. I WANT to know if there are GM crops growing within my area. It is of major concern to me, as if my property is found to have GM crops growing on it, then I loose my organic status. Long hard years of setting it up will be lost forever. Who will compensate me? Hmmmmm?
Posted by organic grower on 13/08/2008 10:42:57 AM
There are plenty of maps available with farm owners names on them already. So what is Simon really worried about? He has been so keen to support this technology, regardless of the high chance of the pollens contaminating (ie. invading the privacy of) other farms. Now the chickens are coming home to roost.
Posted by Susan Anderson on 13/08/2008 11:12:56 AM
Where do you live susan? Me & the chickens wish to visit.
Posted by THE FARMER on 15/08/2008 2:16:07 AM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
13/08/2008 | Bob Phelps, from the Gene Ethics Network, has defended his organisation's controversial decision to publish the location of alleged GM plantings in Victoria, saying other industries need to protect themselves from contamination.
26/11/2008 | If we're serious about roo farming, we'll need to start with a breeding program and kangaroo EBVs for marbling and tenderness.
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
S&L Advertising
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Horse Deals Australia
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...