News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Vic Govt clearfells DPI's forestry unit 

Vic Govt clearfells DPI's forestry unit

12/06/2008 2:48:00 PM
THE STATE Government appears to have turned its back on farm forestry, effectively disbanding its highly-regarded private forestry unit by cutting three quarters of its 16 staff from the end of June.

Forestry groups and co operatives anticipating renewed interest in the sector as a source of carbon credits in the lead up to a national emissions trading scheme have been left reeling by the decision.

They say the Government is taking a short term view and has overlooked the fact that with the cut back in logging in native forests and the growing deficit in terms of trade in timber products, agriculture is the only sector with the land available to help meet future growth in demand for long rotation timber.

Benalla dairy heifer rearer Angus Howell, who ran the Department of Primary Industries’ successful Farm Forestry North East (FFORNE) strategy which resulted in the planting of 1700ha of native hardwoods and establishment of a 90-member commercially focused co operative, said disbanding the unit was flying in the face of common sense.

“It is the complete opposite of what they should be doing,” he said. “Everyone is just aghast.”

Mr Howell said the majority of commercial plantings now going in were for short term woodchip production for export as pulp, driven by the favourable tax treatment available under managed investment schemes rather than commitment to the end product.

Nor were woodchip plantations suited to developing carbon credits because of the shorter rotations and large amounts of carbon used in harvesting.

“Clearly we are facing a crisis,” he said. “We have a deficit of $2billion a year in timber products. We are importing speciality timbers for furniture production, flooring, window frames and architraves. We are protecting native forests for the future but we are not doing anything about increasing the resource on the only land available, cleared agricultural land.”

Mr Howell said farm foresters depended on the Department of Primary Industries’ private forestry unit for advice and support.

“Without them nothing like the area planted would have gone in,” he said. “They have been an enormously useful resource in terms of advice and in terms of promoting the whole concept of tree planting as a commercial enterprise integrated with a whole range of farming operations.”

He conceded the long time frame for sawlog production of 25 years plus and ongoing management costs had acted as a deterrent to expansion of the industry, particularly among farmers cash strapped by the drought.

But he said with the closure of native forests and the likely introduction of a national emissions trading scheme there had been growing interest from superannuation funds and other investors in farm forestry.

“There is an opportunity for carbon,” he said. “There are people interested in planting on rural properties. They have said yes we are interested; the sums do appear to add up. But this sends a clear message to investors that it is not an industry that works. It doesn’t make sense as the only place you can plant for carbon sequestration is on cleared agricultural land.”

Studies have shown up to 10 per cent of farms can be planted to timber without an impact on profitability, in part due to the animal husbandry, biodiversity and environmental benefits they provide.

Mr Howell said forestry could be easily integrated into a range of farming operations and although managing trees for quality timber did require ongoing costs of thinning and management, European experience had been that trees could be a profitable enterprise.

He said growers were not looking for direct funding, only for support.

“Farmers in the main do not have the money to establish trees with a 25 year horizon,” he said. “We are not looking for plantation establishment money, but for help changing the culture to bring investment in.”

Agriculture Minister Joe Helper’s office declined to confirm or deny the unit was being completely disbanded, answer questions on the future of private forestry officers who have made up the unit or on the Government’s future commitment to farm forestry.

A spokesman would say only that the DPI was currently developing a timber industry strategy, which would cover all areas of the industry and would inform future decisions.

"Currently funding for the private forestry comes from the Plantations Incentive Strategy which is coming to the end of its life span,” he said.

"Each year the total number of DPI staff, the type of work they do and where they are located fluctuates depending on the project and industry requirement. When projects commence or conclude, staffing needs change accordingly."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
North Central Victoria's farm productivity is particularly vulnerable to climate change. Farm forestry is important not only in diversifying income for landholders but it also solves salinity problems, improves productivity by providing shade and shelter, provides wildlife habitat and improves the aesthetics of the living environment.

Forests are an essential component of an environmentally, socially and economically sustainable agricultural landscape especially in these challenging times.

The private forestry group has an essential role in supporting and advising private landholders in the development of farm forests and particularly the dissemination of knowledge/expertise/research between organistions like ours to promote research and industry excellence standards.

The exodus of the majority of forestry officers from the DPI, not just the unit, will result in a loss of expertise for future development of the forestry industry.

Over the last 10 years BIFFN Inc has benefited enormously from the great work of the field officers within the department of DPI forestry. We have a very vibrant and healthy network of nearly 40 members with well over 100,000 trees in the ground. It is important to note that we are only in the early stages of our development as an industry promoting value adding and marketing of the Box Ironbark timber species.

Losing the experience of the DPI Forestry Group at this stage will affect our future viability. There are still some important and significant milestones to achieve before a group like ours would be comfortable 'going it alone’.

We are very concerned member enthusiasm may drop off with such a significant reduction in assistance.

BIFFN Inc believes it is essential that funding be restored to the DPI Private Forestry group and we would appreciate your comments on how you intend to continue to build on the foundation that the DPI forestry group has established...

Posted by Sylver Kulture on 13/06/2008 12:58:59 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

6/10/2008 | In journalism there is nothing worse than interviewing someone with TB - True Believerism. But the rapidly changing world is turning traditional ideology upside down, leaving TB sufferers supporting a brand and not a belief.
S&L Advertising
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Rural Bookshop
 
You need cash
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...