News 
 State News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 GM canola crop spreads despite fears 

GM canola crop spreads despite fears

18 Oct, 2009 07:52 PM
THE national crop of genetically modified canola is expected to quadruple compared to last year's debut harvest, as more farmers embrace the benefits of growing the herbicide-resistant strain.

However, GM-free canola remains the overwhelmingly popular choice of growers, with big buyers such as Elders refusing to use silos handling the GM version for fear of upsetting overseas markets.

And conventional canola growers remain concerned about contamination of their crops by the GM version.

Anti-GM groups, maintaining that contamination is "inevitable", have claimed there are GM canola weeds growing by the roadside in Horsham, coupled with the alleged contamination of beehives last month.

Victoria and NSW are the only states that permit GM canola to be commercially harvested since state moratoriums were lifted in 2007.

Canola, the nation's third-largest crop by area, is the only food crop in Australia where a GM version is permitted.

Opponents of GM food crops say their long-term health impacts are unknown and wind, pollen, vehicles or animals can blow their seeds into non-GM crops and contaminate them.

Australian Oilseeds Federation executive director Nick Goddard said 40,000 hectares of GM canola were expected to be harvested in coming weeks, yielding 52,000 tonnes of crop.

This compared to 12,000 tonnes from 9600 hectares last year, the first time GM canola was commercially harvested.

But Mr Goddard said the 52,000 tonnes was small compared to the overall national canola harvest of 1.8 million tonnes, with demand remaining strong for non-GM canola.

He said farmers in Victoria and NSW were becoming more accepting of GM canola, driving the harvest increase.

"It's really growers seeing the benefits of the technology," he said. "They can use the Roundup herbicide, which is a bit softer compared to the regular herbicide.

"They don't need to go backwards and forwards on the tractor to put as much herbicide down, so they're using less diesel. They're also able to plant into the stubble of the previous crop, so they don't have to plough the field as much. Growers are seeing cost benefits."

Still, big canola buyers such as CBH and Elders confirm they will only buy GM-free canola, to satisfy major European and Japanese customers.

Europe has only just relaxed a moratorium on buying GM canola, but is unlikely to be importing canola of any kind due to a bumper domestic harvest. Japan, said Mr Goddard, prefers GM canola from Canada and non-GM canola from Australia.

The expanded GM canola crop this year means 12 GrainCorp silos in Victoria and five in NSW will receive both GM and non-GM canola, stored in separate bins. Last year, only two silos in Victoria did this.

Dozens of other silos - GrainCorp would not confirm the exact number - are only receiving non-GM canola.

Bob Phelps, director of the anti-GM group Gene Ethics, said non-GM buyers such as Elders were refusing to buy at the silos where both GM and non-GM canola were stored out of fear of receiving contaminated product.

He said there was insufficient separation of the two crops at the silos and a real risk of cross-contamination between the two storage bins.

Elders declined to comment to The Sunday Age but head of trading Michael Hein last month told the Wimmera Mail Times "non-GM growers will have to ensure that they don't deliver to both GM and traditional sites because we won't be able to purchase it".

Jessica Harrison, of anti-GM group CropWatch, said not only was there risk of cross-contamination at silos, trucks delivering GM canola to the silos would spill some of their crop on the road.

"It's likely that the seeds are going to spread along the roads leading to the silos, which means that this time next year, a lot of the roadside weeds are going to be GM."

Greenpeace this month said GM canola pollen had contaminated a beehive near Bannockburn in Western Victoria.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Just a few careless farmers are party to this dreadful GMO contamination, they are going to make the rest of the community pay big time. All who are party to this GMO contamination must be held accountable. They are not only putting a noose around their own necks, but everyone else's. Farmers must learn why they have weeds, disease and insect pests and address this in a sustainable way. I urge everyone who foolishly thinks GMOs are the way to go to watch the video at the following link: http://articles.mercola.com/sites /articles/archive/2009/10/17/Ever ything-You-HAVE-TO-KNOW-about-Dan gerous-Genetically-Modified-Foods .aspx Then wake up before its too late.
Posted by ggwagga, 19/10/2009 7:06:46 AM, on Stock & Land
Farmers who use GM plants clearly have no duty of care to the users of these plants.
Posted by mangiri, 19/10/2009 7:23:35 AM, on Stock & Land
The usual Chicken Little nonsense. Let's hope Aussie farmers don't miss the boat. Canada and the US have got a big lead on them.
Posted by dickytiger, 19/10/2009 9:27:02 AM, on Stock & Land
Technophobia rife again. GM provides the most sustainable way of managing crop pests and weeds - less number of sprays, less dangerous chemicals used in the environment less fuel, more production and less cost to farmer - these are proven facts. Also the gene technology regulator has completed rigourous studies and shown that there is no risk to human health and safety or to the environment for this GM canola variety - hence the licence to release this GM into the environment. Most importantly you have been eating GM food for at least 2 decades - anything with soy or its extracts is likely from US which is the largest producer and has been 99% GM for 20 years - noticed any deformities? And thanks ggwagga for the video about learning if my dog has a bladder problem - that is all your video link provides.
Posted by Wessa, 23/10/2009 10:46:07 AM, on Stock & Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
15 October, 2009
14 October, 2009
15 October, 2009
17 October, 2009
15 October, 2009
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Who do you think is the best person to lead the Federal Liberal Party?

Malcolm Turnbull
(46.4%)

Julie Bishop
(5.7%)

Tony Abbott
(10.3%)

Joe Hockey
(23.6%)

Other
(14.1%)

Total Votes: 760
Poll Date: 18 October, 2009
BLOGS
16 October, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...