News 
 State News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Beef’s gas challenge 

Beef’s gas challenge

10 Jul, 2008 04:56 PM
REDUCING livestock emissions is one of the beef industry’s biggest challenges yet, according to Ian Johnsson, Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA).

The agricultural sector is the third largest greenhouse gas emitter behind the industrial and transport sectors and contributes about 16 per cent of national greenhouse gas of which sheep and cattle contribute 70pc (or 11pc of the total) according to the Australian Greenhouse Office (AGO).

The main greenhouse gases emitted from agriculture include methane lost during rumen digestion (enteric) and nitrous oxide lost from nitrogen fertilisers, excretment and soils.

Speaking at the Beef Improvement Association of Australia national conference, Mr Johnsson said understanding ruminant methane production would be the key to developing and delivering mitigation technologies to the Australian industry.

Unlocking mysteries surrounding ruminant methane production, which accounts for a 15pc loss in energy efficiency in the rumen, also represents significant potential productivity gains.

“To date, a comprehensive solution has eluded us, but this research and development has led to feed additives and antibiotics that, to varying degrees, can reduce methane by up to 20 to 30 per cent,” Mr Johnsson said.

Genetic developments for improved growth and feed efficiency and increased grain finishing have also contributed to lowering GHG emissions per tonne of beef in the past decade.

However, net reductions in GHG emissions across the industry have remained elusive and to address this MLA in collaboration with local and international bodies is researching methods for identifying, measuring and ultimately reducing GHG emissions from livestock.

Driven by an already obvious impact on productivity, looming policy decisions and market expectation, the MLA research and development response to climate change focuses on three areas: mitigation, adaptation and awareness.

Mitigation projects will consider new methods for reducing methane from existing systems, including:

l understanding rumen microbes and their response to mitigant treatments;

l finding better tools for measuring methane emissions and quantifying genetic differences;

l measuring GHG output in various grazing systems, and

l livestock treatments such as chemicals, native plant extracts and feed supplements.

Already, research funded by MLA and the AGO at Melbourne University has discovered a way to accurately measure GHG emissions from cattle in feedlot situation using new science and laser and infrared technology.

The first project of its type in the world, the research aims not only to find a method of measuring and estimating emissions, but to develop ways of proving the industry can reduce its contribution to the greenhouse effect.

“The preliminary data is showing that on average in a beef feedlot an animal emits between 200 and 300 grams of greenhouse gases a day. This compares favourably with other countries,” Melbourne University’s Professor Deli Chen said.

“You can only find ways to reduce greenhouse gases if you can reliably measure them.”

The next step will be to determine how diet, genetics, management practices and environment influence GHG emissions.

Feeding malate or fumarate, probiotics, polyunsaturated fats (such as sunflower, cotton seed, canola oil and palm oil), antibiotics in grain diets, adding grain to forage based diets and feeding condensed tannins such as legumes all have the potential to reduce methane emissions, Mr Johnsson said.

Other options include reducing numbers to only the most efficient performers, increasing productivity in terms of kilograms per animal and increasing forage quality.

Less understood measures include genetic selection for low methane output and anti-methane vaccines, neither of which can yet be quantified.

Using feed pads in wet seasons with excretal collection and redistribution, feeding condensed feeds to reduce urinary excretion, using nitrous oxide inhibitors, improving drainage and preventing soil compaction may all also help reduce nitrous oxide emissions.

By finding links between certain practices in the beef industry and the amount of gas emitted, it is hoped that farmers will be able to make long-term plans for reducing their emissions.

MLA will continue to seek international collaboration and identify areas of common interest across the agriculture industry to assist Australian beef farmers reduce their emissions, adapt to climate change and become part of a global solution, Mr Johnsson said..

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
We need to reduce and then eliminate livestock industries. Why avoid the obvious? People still need food. There are always better alternatives to livestock products.
Posted by Vivienne, 10/07/2008 10:47:11 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Langi Kal Kal
 
Win a bull
 
Rural Business Awards
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
2010 Beef & Cattle Directory
 
Horse Deals Australia


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...