News 
 State News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Get on the front foot with animal welfare 

Get on the front foot with animal welfare

16 Apr, 2010 04:00 AM
THERE'S been an ongoing shift towards consumers seeking ethically-raised meat, which has been produced with an environmental focus.

That’s according to Dr Andrew Fisher, Associate Professor, Production Animal Management and Welfare, University of Melbourne, and he says producers need to be aware of this now so they will be better prepared for the future.

“If you look in most Australian supermarkets shelves now, there’s been a huge shift towards free-range or barn produced eggs,” Dr Fisher said.

“From a farmer’s perspective, it means there is an ability to sell eggs that have been produced in this way.”

He says although farmers are skilled at developing a product and growing it to market specifications, they need to be open to adopting best practices now, because consumers are becoming more aware of animal welfare issues.

“If producers embrace change now, then their products will be better matched to consumers in the future.”

Dr Fisher himself has a wealth of experience in the animal welfare arena. He graduated as a veterinarian from the University of Melbourne and after practicing in Colac and northern England, he completed a PhD in beef cattle health and welfare through the Veterinary Faculty of University College Dublin. In 2002, Andrew joined the CSIRO, and helped establish the CSIRO Animal Welfare Research Group, as well as improved practices for pain management in farm animals, livestock transportation and measurement of animal welfare. He is now in his current role at the University of Melbourne.

Speaking at MLA’s Southern Meat Profit Day, which will be held on April 30, Dr Fisher hopes to get farmers thinking about how they can adopt best practices on-farm.

At the moment, he said Australia is in the midst of developing new welfare standards and guidelines to establish a more uniform code across the country.

Dr Fisher says this will be an important step towards Australia improving their animal welfare across the board.

And for producers, it is all about improving their on-farm practices, while at the same time improving their product.

“As consumers become wealthier they tend to eat more meat, which is good news for producers, but they also become more selective about what products they buy.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Is this the same as politically correct raised meat?
Posted by tigerdicky, 16/04/2010 8:34:29 AM, on Stock & Land
What a load of crap, most consumers are more concerned about the cost and quality than how it was produced. In fact most don't even know how it is produced so how can they discriminate between ethicaly produced and not? When farmers get paid more to do things in a more difficult and expensive manner then I'm sure they will change their ways. Otherwise why bother?
Posted by Mick, 16/04/2010 5:08:39 PM, on Stock & Land
So when will the MLA get on board and provide differentiated support to beef and lamb products that are "organic" and/or "pasture raised"? Why is there such fear about differentiation in the marketplace? Failing to do adopt these marketing practices at an industry (MLA) level encourages individual and collectives of producers to go off and do their own thing - without support and without standards being applied.
Posted by JJ, 16/04/2010 5:36:05 PM, on Stock & Land
Of course farming could do with plenty of better animal welfare practices, and the sooner the better.
Posted by Barker, 18/04/2010 1:40:18 PM, on Stock & Land
Once people are made aware of the terrible treatment that farm animals are forced to endure then they won't buy into cruelty. Farmers must change their ways or face the consequences of their cruelty.
Posted by Kathleen, 18/04/2010 1:46:21 PM, on Stock & Land
Mick, it is your totally ignorant and irresponsible attitude to this complex issue that lowers consumers' opinions and trust of farmers. You obviously do not understand the laws of leverage when it comes to gaining greater returns for produce. One only has to look at the leverage of the film industry and sports players. Just look at their income for the little time and energy they expend; just look at their ridiculously high income. Farmers like Mick are like the bad apple syndrome, stuff it up for everyone. That is unless individuals or groups differentiate themselves by marketing a branded product which satisfies consumers expectations with real or perceived product advantages.
Posted by ggwagga, 19/04/2010 7:33:55 AM, on Stock & Land
Does this mean that we all have to have the added expense of joining a QA program or could the MLA merely put an extra question on the vendor dec. to ask if these animals have been paddock reared or feed-lotted? And WHY do the producers constantly have to bear the burden of these extra costs at no extra return?
Posted by Helen Clark, 19/04/2010 7:48:35 AM, on Stock & Land
You are absolutely right Mick. The majority of consumers don't care. A small but vocal minority do, but they are rarely prepared to back up their beliefs with their wallet. This sort of stuff has been around for decades and there have never been any market premiums paid for it, and it is highly unlikely that there ever will be.
Posted by Qlander, 20/04/2010 1:58:55 PM, on Stock & Land
Someone should definitely introduce animal welfare into farming. It seems that not much help will ever come from those who continue to tolerate intensive farming, live export, caged hens or other inhumane practices inflicted on animals. Whether being meat eater or vegetarian makes no difference, the fact is that most of the public are opposed to cruelty. Also being anti-cruelty is not being anti-farmer - a statement that is often made by some people.
Posted by Barker, 21/04/2010 12:36:33 PM, on Stock & Land
To Qlander, the majority of consumers don't know.
Posted by Get Real, 22/04/2010 10:52:24 AM, on Stock & Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Dr Andrew Fisher will be speaking to producers at MLA's Southerh Meat Profit Day later this month on how they can adopt better animal welfare practices now and ultimately produce a better product.
Dr Andrew Fisher will be speaking to producers at MLA's Southerh Meat Profit Day later this month on how they can adopt better animal welfare practices now and ultimately produce a better product.

Most popular articles




Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...