News 
 State News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Research shows beef grading proposal is "low quality" 

Research shows beef grading proposal is "low quality"

23 Feb, 2010 03:51 PM
HIGH consumer satisfaction levels with the quality of beef contradict dire assumptions about beef labelling being put forward by some industry participants in NSW, according to the Cattle Council of Australia.

CCA president Greg Brown said a study of 1271 grocery buyers from across Australia indicated shoppers were mostly satisfied with the quality of beef they bought.

Price (78 per cent) was the most widely mentioned factor influencing consumer purchasing decisions for lower income earners, highlighting the damaging proposition put forward in NSW to label all budget beef as “low quality”.

“The proponents of this move, including a prominent NSW beef processor, argue that introducing a 'low quality' label for some beef sold on the domestic market will shift price-conscious shoppers to pay more for higher quality product,” Mr Brown said.

“This is clearly an absurd suggestion, as the likelihood is that the only winners from such a move would be our competitors as price-conscious consumers choose cheaper proteins such as chicken and pork which won’t carry labels that will scare them off.”

Nicholas Cameron from Galaxy Research said that the majority of grocery buyers have no difficulty in selecting the quality of beef they require.

“Nine in 10 grocery buyers find the quality of beef they purchase meets their expectations with only 5pc not confident of purchasing the quality they require,” Mr Cameron said.

“They rate the consistency of beef well (81pc) and this compares favourably against other categories such as fruit (74pc), vegetables (78pc) and seafood (65pc).”

Trust in beef retailers is also high, with nine in ten buyers having a high or moderate level of trust in their retailers to provide a high quality product.

CCA says the consumer satisfaction results are testament to the improvements that the industry has made over the past decade to beef quality, including raising retail standards, feeding regimes designed to optimise eating quality, and the adoption of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) program and science.

“Assuring eating quality for the consumer is something that the Cattle Council and industry has worked long and hard for. We now have a meat grading system (MSA) that is underpinned by science and in sync with what consumers want,” Mr Brown said.

“The last thing we need is more ‘red tape’. Beef producers, not Government, should be setting the standards for the way our product is marketed.”

MSA is now grading in excess of 1 million head per year and is the world’s only consumer-based cut-by-cook grading program based on over 75,000 consumers providing scores on 650,000 beef samples.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Perhaps Mr Brown could now expend some funds into research into the ‘Pork Industry’ and see if there are any parallels that may have cross implications into the Cattle industry. According to his testimony on Monday 22 Feb 2010 at the Senate inquiry Mr Brown has no idea of what happened to the Pork industry – not his field apparently. For Cattle Council members this would seem just a tad more important than his grocery watch research one would have thought. As Senator Colbeck said at Monday’s Senate hearing about Cattle Council’s performance — “That will do me for the moment but can I say that this is one of the worst representative performances I have come across in my time in the Senate. It is just so disappointing to hear what I have heard here this morning. I do not want to get into a dustup across the table because that is not my thing but I have to say it is one of the most disappointing representative performances I have heard from a body on beef and cattle issues since I have been in the parliament.”
Posted by The Middle Stump, 24/02/2010 10:45:58 AM, on Stock & Land
The ACC must be looking through a 'custom made' horror-scope. These people's view of reality defies gravity let alone logic. Their market sampling must have been confined to one random subject. Couple this with their idiotic position on BSE and the term 'troglodyte' springs to mind! What is wrong with these people?
Posted by Clark Goodwin, 24/02/2010 5:27:00 PM, on Stock & Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
22 February, 2010
23 February, 2010
POLL
Q: Has the Meat Standards Australia system been good for sales of Australian red meat?

Yes
(46.6%)

No
(33.2%)

Undecided
(20.2%)

Total Votes: 410
Poll Date: 21 February, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...