News 
 State News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Fallout from wool snub continues 

Fallout from wool snub continues

22 Aug, 2009 05:00 AM
IF Australian wool textile managing director Michael Fitzsimons thought he might get a level playing field when his wool fabric was tested against an imported moquette fabric for the multi-million dollar NSW rail upgrade fitting, he was mistaken.

After the NSW Minister for Transport Minister David Campbell and NSW railway company Rail Corp promised to complete an independent cost analysis of the Australian-made Instyle wool product against a moquette fabric and jacquard fabrics it was considering for train seats, Mr Fitzsimons said nothing was followed up.

Mr Fitzsimons said Instyle’s Australian made and manufactured, 100 per cent Australian Merino wool fabric did not even make it to the comparative stage, and yet a nine-page report sent via Mr Campbell said the decision was final.

"The Australian textile industry is going through a difficult period and this order would have been a very valuable contract," Mr Fitzsimons said.

The acknowledgement that a British produced Moquette would be sourced for the rail upgrade comes after months of campaigning by Instyle and its consortium including Macquarie Textiles and Geelong Textiles and recently with assistance from the Australian Wool innovation.

"We have written letters to Rail Corp, rung them and have not received a single reply. It is just arrogance," he said.

"They haven’t taken into account Australian textile workers, Australian wool producers or the Australian environment.

"Premier Rees reports he wants to push Australian jobs and save environment - this is a project he should be stepping in on."

Mr Fitzsimons said he was concerned about the non-existent fire standard requirements in Rail Corp's specification.

"The fire specifications were decribed by the CSIRO as totally ridiculous," he said.

The $200 million PPP railway project is set to deliver 626 new eight-car, double-deck and air-conditioned trains to NSW by 2013.

Mr Fitzsimons said: "They are saying our wool product would be heavier and less cost-efficient but it was not even trialled."

He said the moquette fabric on the rail seats would add an extra 50 tonnes of weight, resulting in more gas emissions than would his Australian Ethno-wool product.

Rail Corp communications manager Paul Rae confirmed it had completed a financial and economic appraisal review that covered a range of performance criteria including the through-life durability, maintenance and ongoing replacement costs of seating fabric.

It definitively concluded moquette provides value for money with particular regard to lifecycle costs over a 30-year contract term.

Mr Rae said the train builder, Downer EDI Rail, which had completed the fabric study identified moquette fabric from a United Kingdom based company, Holdworth, as "most closely meeting Rail Corp’s contract specifications".

He said Moquette comprised 85 per cent wool, with the majority being fine wool sourced from Australia.

Mr Fitzsimons denied moquette fabric used fine wool, saying it always contained course wool typically sourced from South Africa or New Zealand.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I've wondered why wool insulation wasn't considered for the stimulus package ceiling insulation project. Now I believe that the awful pink batts will have to be imported to complete the job. Wool is a safe & natural Aussie product, fire retardant, & doesn't break down like the pink jobs. Money in Aussie pockets all the way.
Posted by a GRAZIER, 22/08/2009 11:42:02 AM, on Stock & Land
I have to challenge Paul Rea and Rail Corps financial and economic appraisal review. How could such a review take place without conducting comparative tests between the imported moquette and the Australian fabric? Rail Corp does not even have a sample of the proposed Australian fabric. Rail Corp have failed to explain their decision not to conduct the comparative tests and have relied upon seriously flawed assumptions and in some cases misrepresentations to draw their desired conclusion. This casts absolute doubt over their comments that the moquette provides the best value for money. Further Mr Rea's comments that the imported moquette "most closely meeting Rail Corp's contract specifications" needs to be considered in light of the fact the specification allowed for the moquette to be used and the non existent fire safety requirements identified by the CSIRO as "totally ridiculous". It should be noted that the Australian fabric would meet the Rail Corp specification. The losers are Australian wool growers, textile workers and NSW tax payers who will be paying for the additional 58 tonne of unnecessary moquette fabric weight being pulled around the rail network
Posted by michael fitzsimons, 24/08/2009 3:26:43 PM, on Stock & Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
19 August, 2009
18 August, 2009
21 August, 2009
20 August, 2009
MULTIMEDIA
19 August, 2009
17 August, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Federal Government buy Cubbie Station?

Yes
(29.1%)

No
(66.2%)

Undecided
(4.7%)

Total Votes: 656
Poll Date: 16 August, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...