News 
 State News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Senator opens way for scrapping of AWI 

Senator opens way for scrapping of AWI

03 Nov, 2009 10:10 AM
NEW South Wales Liberal Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells has opened the way for real debate on the future of Australian Wool Innovation, calling for it to be replaced with a broad, skills-based, industry-wide body.

Senator Fierravanti-Wells told the Senate last week that her study leave investigation and subsequent 620-page report on the Australian wool industry had concluded that AWI’s problems were "systematic and ingrained".

"It's standing and reliability as an effective organisation have been compromised to the point where it is best for the Australian government and industry stakeholders to start afresh with the establishment of a broad skills based, industry-wide body," Senator Fierravanti-Wells said.

Senator Fierravanti-Wells did not stipulate who should be involved in the new "go-to-body" for wool, but said in addition to wool growers, processors, testing and certification bodies it should include members from the textile and apparel sector, fashion industry, research and educational stakeholders, trade development and marketing expertise.

As figures from the Australian industry annual report this year showed the wool industry generated $2.6 billion to the national economy, Senator Fierravanti-Wells said the industries value to the economy and the many it employed was too big to let it slide.

"What has become apparent to me is that the wool industry has failed to start with a clear view of the needs of the consumer and the properties of wool and work back and produce what the consumer wants," she said, noting that the days of being a production orientated business were gone and change must be made to recognise this.

The Senator distanced herself from suggestions that she was representing a group, stating her views were formed during a visit to Italy and consultation with members of the wool industry.

She said mulesing was one of the most import issues facing the industry and AWI had "badly handled" it since the beginning.

While flystrike prevention was important, Senator Fierravanti-Wells said, as long as surgical mulesing was used the industry would be burdened with negative sentiment and a "reality check" needed to be made to rid itself of this tag.

"Regrettably, rightly or wrongly the long-term continuation of this practice is not sustainable," she said.

Proposed industry changesinclude strengthing ties between Australian and Italian wool bodies, Australian government and wool industry support to AWEX on-farm audits and development of a ethical quality mark for labelling.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Keep to knitting, luv, and leave it to the people who know how to make the decisions!
Posted by tigerdicky, 3/11/2009 2:29:51 PM, on Stock & Land
Since 1991 the Australian wool industry has had at least 13 wool organisations backed by Government & funded by woolgrowers. That averages out at 1.4 years per organisation! More industry restructure is the last thing we need. Now is the time to look forward, work with what we have and build the industry, not destroy it.
Posted by Martin Oppenheimer, 3/11/2009 5:55:07 PM, on Stock & Land
Congratulations Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells. You have produced the most lucid and honest review of the wool industry in living memory. Everyone now knows that AWI is nothing more than a rotting carcase - they have done nothing new in 12 months and seem hellbent on annoying customers by ignoring the mulesing issue. No wonder the Italians have abandoned our superfine wool. Heffernan and Merriman must be squirming like worms on hot concrete now that you have told the truth. Now is the time to look forward, work with what we have and build the industry - but first we have to get rid of the dead wood called AWI and all its political nepotists.
Posted by Sir George, 3/11/2009 6:33:26 PM, on Stock & Land
Let's get this straight - a Senator from Wollongong is now an expert on the wool industry. She wants to close down processing in Italy and China, and bring it back to Australia? She talks about IWTO as the International Wool "Testing" Organisation? She wants mulesing to be banned (oh God, here we go again)... Is she a Lib or a greeny? Malcolm Turnball, do you Support woolgrowers like the Labor Government does, or are you going to sacrifice us and allow all our sheep to die from flystrike like your good Senator from Wollongong nows wants to do. God preserve us from idiots in Parliament.
Posted by Elvis, 3/11/2009 7:26:12 PM, on Stock & Land
Where has this bird been for the last twelve months? After years of poor performance under politically directed management AWI at last has a skills based board and now this dopey politician calls for a skills based board.
Posted by Ted O'Brien., 4/11/2009 5:48:01 AM, on Stock & Land
This comment is spot on. I entered product manufacture for a while as a wool grower and suddenly realised how badly managed the industry was. What has become apparent to me is that the wool industry has failed to start with a clear view of the needs of the consumer and the properties of wool and work back and produce what the consumer wants.
Posted by Long gone, 4/11/2009 6:15:06 AM, on Stock & Land
I am not much of a fan of the agro political groups like AWGA, but for once Mr Oppenheimer is right. The last thing we need to do right now is to throw the baby out with the bath water. Steady the boat and look to the future as a fantastic by product from meat. Sorry guys that's all it might be.
Posted by Mick, 4/11/2009 6:59:24 AM, on Stock & Land
When are you woolgrowers going to realise that without you there is no industry for all the marketing and research parasites to suck on. Like so many farming pursuits, the wool industry pays board members, executives and staff more than the average farmer's income.

You would be better off putting a sign on your front gate "WOOL FOR SALE". If there is a dollar to be made by the purchasing, processing and the reselling of a product, merchants will beat a path to your door.

Posted by steffi, 4/11/2009 7:10:02 AM, on Stock & Land
This outrage must be nipped in the bud immediately. Concetta obviously wants a structure for wool like MLA, where taxpayer-funded peak councils (ie the government) control the industry with their on-farm audits adding to production costs.

This is pure socialism. What is the Liberal party doing pushing this platform? My 86 votes are going straight to Wally.

Posted by Brad Bellinger, 4/11/2009 7:43:10 AM, on Stock & Land
Here we go again, jobs for the boys and the wool "Purple Circle". Sir George, traditionally a defeated Knight, fell on his sword. Fall, George, fall.
Posted by Judas, 4/11/2009 7:47:19 AM, on Stock & Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
NSW Liberal Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells.
NSW Liberal Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
31 October, 2009
03 November, 2009
02 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Nationals and Liberals dissolve the Federal Coalition?

Yes
(47.1%)

No
(46%)

Undecided
(6.8%)

Total Votes: 526
Poll Date: 01 November, 2009

Most popular articles




Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...